UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  x☒                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨☐

Check the appropriate box:

Important Notice to Fund Shareholders

November [    ], 2014September 30, 2020

Although we recommend that you read the complete Proxy Statement, for your convenience, we have provided a brief overview of the issues to be voted on.

Shareholders of the Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund are also being asked to approve a revision of the Fund’s fundamental policy regarding industry concentration.

Your Fund’s Board, including the independent Board Members, unanimously recommends that you voteFOReach proposal applicable to your Fund.

Your vote is very important. We encourage you as a shareholder to participate in your Fund’s governance by returning your vote as soon as possible. If enough shareholders do not cast their votes, your Fund may not be able to hold itsthe meeting or the vote on each issue, and additional solicitation costs may need to be incurred in order to obtain sufficient shareholder participation.

If shareholders of your Fund do not approve the new investment management agreement and new sub-advisory agreement prior to February 28, 2015, Nuveen Fund Advisors and NAM will no longer be able to act as your Fund’s adviser and subadviser. The Board will take such action as it deems to be in the best interests of the Fund, including potentially liquidating the Fund.

i

You will be able to attend the meeting online and submit your questions during the meeting by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/251819459. You also will be able to vote your shares online by attending the meeting by webcast. To participate in the meeting, you will need to log on using the control number from your proxy card or meeting notice. The control number can be found in the shaded box. The password for the meeting is NUV2020.

If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you must register in advance using the instructions below.

The online meeting will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m., Central time on November 16, 2020. We encourage you to access the meeting prior to the start time leaving ample time for the check in. Please follow the access instructions as outlined herein.

To register to attend the meeting online by webcast, you must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your Fund holdings along with your name and email address to shareholdermeetings@computershare.com. You must contact the bank or broker who holds your shares to obtain your legal proxy. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, three business days prior to the meeting date.

You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after we receive your registration materials.

Requests for registration should be directed to us by emailing an image of your legal proxy to shareholdermeetings@computershare.com.

We recognize the inconvenience of the proxy solicitation process and would not impose on you if we did not believe that the matters being proposed were important. Once your vote has been registered with the proxy solicitor, your name will be removed from the solicitor’s follow-up contact list.

ii

Notice of Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 22, 2014		333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 (800) 257-8787

Notice of Special Meeting

Nuveen Investment Funds, Inc.of Shareholders

to be held on November 16, 2020

November [    ], 2014September 30, 2020

To the Shareholders of the Above Funds:

Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of Shareholders (the “Meeting”) of Nuveen Investment Funds, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), on behalf of itseach series Nuveen Mid Cap Index Fundof the Corporation (each series of the Corporation, as identified above and Nuveen Small Cap Index Fund (eachon Appendix A to the enclosed Joint Proxy Statement, individually a “Fund,” and collectively, the “Funds”), will be held in the offices(along with meetings of shareholders of several other Nuveen Investments, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606,funds) on Monday, December 22, 2014,November 16, 2020, at 2:00 p.m., Central time, for the following purposes and to transact such other business, if any, as may properly come before the Meeting:

Matters to Be Voted on by Shareholders:

Shareholders of record at the close of business on October 28, 2014 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Meeting.

All shareholders are cordially invited to attend the Meeting.Meeting, which will be held online as discussed in further detail below. In order to avoid delay and additional expense, and to assure that your shares are represented, please vote as promptly as possible, regardless of whether or not you plan to attend the Meeting. You may vote by mail, telephone or over the Internet. To vote by mail, please mark, sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy card. No postage is required if mailed in the United States. To vote by telephone, please call the toll-free number located on your proxy card and follow the recorded instructions, using your proxy card as a guide. To vote over the Internet, go to the Internet address provided on your proxy card and follow the instructions, using your proxy card as a guide.

If you intendShareholders of record as of the close of business on September 17, 2020 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

In light of public health concerns regarding the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of shareholders, which will be conducted exclusively by webcast. Shareholders will not be able to attend the Meeting in person and you are a record holder of a Fund’s shares, in order to gain admission you must show photographic identification, such as your driver’s license. If you intendperson. Shareholders will be able to attend the Meeting online and submit their questions during the Meeting by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/251819459. Shareholders will also be able to vote their shares online by attending the Meeting by webcast. To participate in person andthe Meeting, you will need to log on using the control number from your proxy card or Meeting notice. The control number can be found in the shaded box. The password for the Meeting is NUV2020. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other custodian, in order to gain admission you must show photographic identification,an intermediary, such as your driver’s license, and satisfactory proof of ownership of shares of a Fund, such as your voting instruction form (or a copy thereof) or broker’s statement indicating ownership as of a recent date. If you hold your shares in a brokerage account or through a bank or other nominee,broker, you will not be able to votemust register in person atadvance using the Meeting unless you have previously requested and obtained a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee and present it atinstructions contained in the Meeting.enclosed Joint Proxy Statement.

Kevin J. McCarthyChristopher M. Rohrbacher

Vice President and Secretary

Joint Proxy Statement		333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 (800) 257-8787

November [            ], 2014Joint Proxy Statement

September 30, 2020

This Joint Proxy Statement is first being mailed to shareholders on or about November [    ], 2014.

Nuveen Investment Funds, Inc.October 1, 2020.

This Joint Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors (the “Board,”“Board” and each director a “Board Member” and collectively, the “Board Members”) of Nuveen Investment Funds, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), on behalf of itseach series Nuveen Mid Cap Index Fundof the Corporation (each series of the Corporation, as identified above and Nuveen Small Cap Index Fund (eachon Appendix A, individually a “Fund,” and collectively, the “Funds”), of proxies to be voted at the Special Meeting of Shareholders to be held in(along with the officesmeeting of shareholders of several other Nuveen Investments, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606,funds) on Monday, December 22, 2014,November 16, 2020, at 2:00 p.m., Central time (for each Fund, a(the “Meeting” and collectively, the “Meetings”), and at any and all adjournments, postponements or delays thereof.Appendix A sets forth the abbreviated name of each Fund by which such Fund is referred to in this Joint Proxy Statement.

Proposals

regarding industry concentration.

Voting Information

Shareholders of record as of the close of business on September 17, 2020 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof.

1

In light of public health concerns regarding the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of shareholders, which will be conducted exclusively by webcast. Shareholders will not be able to attend the Meeting in person. Shareholders will be able to attend the Meeting online and submit their questions during the Meeting by visiting www.meetingcenter.io/251819459. Shareholders will also be able to vote their shares online by attending the Meeting by webcast. To participate in the Meeting, you will need to log on using the control number from your proxy card or meeting notice. The control number can be found in the shaded box. The password for the Meeting is NUV2020. If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, you must register in advance using the instructions contained in this Joint Proxy Statement.

On the proposals coming before eachthe Meeting as to which a choice has been specified by shareholders on the proxy, the shares will be voted accordingly. If a properly executed proxy is returned and no choice is specified, the shares will be voted:

1

Shareholders who execute proxies may revoke them at any time before they are voted by filing a written notice of revocation, by delivering a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Meeting and voting in person.at the Meeting. A prior proxy can also be revoked by voting again through the toll-free number or the Internet address listed in the proxy card. Merely attending the Meeting, however, will not revoke any previously submitted proxy.

A quorum of shareholders is required to take action at eachthe Meeting. Ten percent (10%) of the shares entitled to vote at eachthe Meeting, represented in person (virtually) or by proxy, will constitute a quorum of shareholders at thatthe Meeting. Votes cast by proxy or in person (virtually) at each Meeting will be tabulated by the inspectors of election appointed for thatthe Meeting. The inspectors of election will determine whether or not a quorum is present at the Meeting. The inspectors of election will treat abstentions and “broker non-votes” (i.e., shares held by brokers or nominees, typically in “street name,” as to which (i) instructions have not been received from the beneficial owners or persons entitled to vote and (ii) the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power on a particular matter) as present for purposes of determining a quorum.

Broker-dealer firms holding shares of a Fund in “street name” for the benefit of their customers and clients will request the instructions of such customers and clients on how to vote their shares before the Meeting. The Funds understand that, under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, such broker-dealer firms may for certain “routine” matters, without instructions from their customers and clients, grant discretionary authority to the proxies designated by the Board to vote if no instructions have been received prior to the date specified in the broker-dealer firm’s request for voting instructions. Proposal 41 is a “routine” matter and beneficial owners who do not provide proxy instructions or who do not return a proxy card may have their shares voted by broker-dealer firms in favor of proposal 4.Proposal 1.

Broker-dealers who are not members of the New York Stock Exchange may be subject to other rules, which may or may not permit them to vote your shares without instruction. We urge you to provide instructions to your broker or nominee so that your votes may be counted.

Certain funds in the Nuveen fund complex invest their assets in other funds in the fund complex, including the Funds. Such funds of funds will vote any shares of the Funds in the same proportion as the vote of all other shareholders of the applicable Fund.

2

The details of the proposals to be voted on by the shareholders of each Fund and the vote required for approval of the proposals are set forth under the description of the proposals below.

The Board has determined that the use of this Joint Proxy Statement for eachthe Meeting is in the best interest of each Fund in light of the similar proposals being considered and voted on by the shareholders. Certain other Nuveen funds, not listed in this Joint Proxy Statement, will also hold meetings of shareholders with similar proposals. If you were also a shareholder of record of one or more of those other funds on the record date established for the meetings of shareholders of such other funds, you will receive a separate proxy statement and proxy card(s) relating to those funds. Shareholders of each Fund that is a series of the Corporation will vote separatelytogether on Proposal 1.

Only shareholders of the respective proposals relating to their Fund. In any event, an unfavorableNuveen Global Infrastructure Fund will vote on any proposal by the shareholders of one Fund will not affect the implementation of such proposal by the other Fund if the proposal is approved by the shareholders of that Fund.

Each Fund held a special meeting of shareholders (along with meetings of shareholders of several other Nuveen funds) on August 5, 2014 (the “August Meeting”) to seek shareholder approval of certain proposals set forth herein. If you were a shareholder of a Fund on June 6, 2014, you would have received proxy materials related to the August Meeting. However, each

2

Fund was unable to achieve attendance, in person or by proxy, of a sufficient number of shareholders to approve the proposals at the August Meeting and any adjournments thereof. Votes cast in connection with the August Meeting will not be recognized at the Meeting. Therefore, whether or not you voted in connection with the August Meeting, in order for your vote to be counted at the Meeting you must vote now by completing and signing the enclosed proxy card, and mailing it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or you may vote by telephone by calling the toll-free number on the proxy card or by computer by going to the Internet address provided on the proxy card and following the instructions, using your proxy card as a guide.Proposal 2.

Shares Outstanding

Those persons who were shareholders of record atas of the close of business on October 28, 2014 (the “Record Date”),Record Date will be entitled to one vote for each share held and a proportionate fractional vote for each fractional share held.Appendix A lists the shares of each class of each Fund that were issued and outstanding as of the Record Date.

3

PROPOSAL 1: APPROVALELECTION OF NEW INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTSBOARD MEMBERS

BackgroundAt the Meeting, ten (10) nominees, Jack B. Evans,William C. Hunter,Albin F. Moschner, John K. Nelson,Judith M. Stockdale, Carole E. Stone,Terence J. Toth, Margaret L. Wolff and Robert L. Young, each a current Board Member, and Matthew Thornton III, a nominee for election as a Board Member, are to be elected by all shareholders to serve a term until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualified.

Nuveen Fund Advisors servesJack B. Evans,William C. Hunter,John K. Nelson,Judith M. Stockdale, Carole E. Stone andTerence J. Toth were last elected to the Corporation’s Board at a special meeting of shareholders held on August 5, 2014. Margaret L. Wolff was appointed as each Fund’s investment advisera Board Member of the Corporation effective as of February 15, 2016. Albin F. Moschner was appointed as a Board Member of the Corporation effective as of July 1, 2016. Robert L. Young was appointed as a Board Member of the Corporation effective as of July 1, 2017. Matthew Thornton III does not currently serve on the Board of the Corporation and is responsiblea nominee for each Fund’s overall investment strategy and its implementation. Nuveen Fund Advisors is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (“Nuveen”). On April 14, 2014, TIAA-CREF entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (the “Transaction Agreement”) to acquire Nuveen fromelection at the investor group led by Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC (“MDP”), a private equity investment firm based in Chicago, Illinois. TIAA-CREF is a national financial services organization with approximately $844 billion in assets under management, as of June 30, 2014 (based on assets under management across Nuveen affiliates and TIAA-CREF investment management teams as of such date), andMeeting.

It is the leading providerintention of retirement servicesthe persons named in the academic, research, medical and cultural fields. The Transaction was completed on October 1, 2014 and Nuveen became a wholly-owned subsidiaryenclosed proxy to vote the shares represented thereby for the election of TIAA-CREF. Nuveen operatesthe nominees listed above unless the proxy is marked otherwise. Each of the nominees has agreed to serve as a separate subsidiary within TIAA-CREF’s asset management business. Nuveen’s current leadership and key investment teams are expected to stay in place.

Prior to the closingBoard Member of the Transaction, Nuveen Fund Advisors served as each Fund’s investment adviser under an investment management agreement between Nuveen Fund Advisors andCorporation if elected. However, should any nominee become unable or unwilling to accept nomination for election, the Corporation (each, an “Original Investment Management Agreement” and collectively, the “Original Investment Management Agreements”). The date of each Fund’s Original Investment Management Agreement and the date on which it was last approved by shareholders and approvedproxies will be voted for continuancesubstitute nominees, if any, designated by the Corporation’s present Board.

All Board Member nominees are provided inAppendix B.

Each Original Investment Management Agreement,not “interested persons” as required by Section 15 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), provided for its automatic termination in the event of its “assignment” (as defined in the 1940 Act). Any change in controlAct, of the Adviser is deemed to be an assignment. The consummationFunds or of the Transaction resulted in a change in control of the Adviser and therefore caused the automatic termination of each Original Investment Management Agreement, as required by the 1940 Act.

In anticipation of the Transaction, the Board met at a series of joint meetings, including meetings of the full Board and meetings of the Independent Board Members (as defined herein) separately, commencing in February 2014 and concluding at the Board’s April 30, 2014 in person meeting for purposes of, among other things, considering whether it would be in the best interests of each Fund to approve a new investment management agreement between the Corporation and Nuveen Fund Advisors, on behalfLLC, the Funds’ investment adviser (the “Adviser”), and have never been an employee or director of each Fund in substantiallyNuveen, LLC (“Nuveen”), the same form asAdviser’s parent company, or any affiliate. Accordingly, such Board Members are deemed “Independent Board Members.”

The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote FOR the Original Investment Management Agreement to take effect immediately after the Transaction or shareholder approval, whichever would occur later (each a “New Investment Management Agreement” and collectively, the “New Investment Management Agreements”). The formelection of the New Investment Management Agreement is attached hereto asAppendix I.nominees named herein.

The 1940 Act requires that each New Investment Management Agreement be approved by the Fund’s shareholders in order for it to become effective. At the April 30, 2014 Board meeting, and for the reasons discussed below (see “Board Considerations” after proposal 2), the Board, including a majority of the Board Members who are not parties to the Original Investment Management Agreements, New Investment Management Agreements or the sub-advisory agreement entered into by the Adviser with respect to any Fund or who are not “interested

4

persons” (as defined

5

6

7

8

9

Share Ownership

In order to create an appropriate identity of interests between Board Members and shareholders, the boards of directors/trustees of the Nuveen funds have adopted a governance principle pursuant to which each Board Member is expected to invest, either directly or on a deferred basis, at least the equivalent of one year of compensation in funds in the 1940 Act)Nuveen complex.

The dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by each Board Member and nominee in each Fund and all Nuveen funds overseen by the Fund, the Adviser, or the sub-adviser (the “Independent Board Members”), unanimously approved the continuationMember as of the Original Investment Management Agreement and approved the New Investment Management Agreement on behalfDecember 31, 2019 is set forth in Appendix B. The number of shares of each Fund beneficially owned by each Board

10

Member and unanimously recommended approvalby the Board Members and executive officers of the New Investment Management Agreement by shareholders.Funds as a group as of December 31, 2019 is set forth in Appendix B. As of the Record Date, each Board Member’s and executive officer’s individual beneficial shareholdings of each Fund constituted less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each Fund. As of the Record Date, the Board Members and executive officers as a group beneficially owned less than 1% of the outstanding shares of each Fund.

Because the Funds were unable to achieveCompensation

Independent Board Members receive a $195,000 annual retainer plus: (a) a fee of $6,750 per day for attendance in person or by proxy,telephone at regularly scheduled meetings of the Board; (b) a sufficient numberfee of shareholders to approve$3,000 per meeting for attendance in person or by telephone at special, non-regularly scheduled meetings of the proposalsBoard where in-person attendance is required and $2,000 per meeting for attendance by telephone or in person at such meetings where in-person attendance is not required; (c) a fee of $2,500 per meeting for attendance in person or by telephone at Audit Committee meetings where in-person attendance is required and $2,000 per meeting for attendance by telephone or in person at such meetings where in-person attendance is not required; (d) a fee of $5,000 per meeting for attendance in person or by telephone at Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee meetings where in-person attendance is required and $2,000 per meeting for attendance by telephone or in person at such meetings where in-person attendance is not required; (e) a fee of $1,000 per meeting for attendance in person or by telephone at Dividend Committee meetings; (f) a fee of $500 per meeting for attendance in person or by telephone at all other committee meetings ($1,000 for shareholder meetings) where in-person attendance is required and $250 per meeting for attendance by telephone or in person at such committee meetings (excluding shareholder meetings) where in-person attendance is not required, and $100 per meeting when the August MeetingExecutive Committee acts as pricing committee for IPOs, plus, in each case, expenses incurred in attending such meetings, provided that no fees are received for meetings held on days on which regularly scheduled Board meetings are held; and any adjournments thereof, shareholders(g) a fee of each Fund were unable approve the New Investment Management Agreement prior$2,500 per meeting for attendance in person or by telephone at Open-End Funds Committee meetings where in-person attendance is required and $2,000 per meeting for attendance by telephone or in person at such meetings where in-person attendance is not required, provided that no fees are received for meetings held on days on which regularly scheduled Board meetings are held. In addition to the closingpayments described above, the Chair of the Transaction. Therefore an interim investment management agreement betweenBoard receives $90,000, the Adviserchairpersons of the Audit Committee, the Dividend Committee, the Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Corporation with respect to each Fund (each, an “Interim Investment Management Agreement” and collectively, the “Interim Investment Management Agreements”) took effect on October 1, 2014 upon the closing of the Transaction. At the April 30, 2014 meeting, the Board, including theOpen-End Funds Committee receive $15,000 as additional annual retainers. Independent Board Members unanimously approved an Interim Investment Management Agreementalso receive a fee of $3,000 per day for each Fund in ordersite visits to ensure continuity of investment advisoryentities that provide services to the Funds afterNuveen funds on days on which no Board meeting is held. When ad hoc committees are organized, the Transaction. The termsNominating and Governance Committee will at the time of each Interim Investment Management Agreement are substantially identicalformation determine compensation to those of the Original Investment Management Agreements and New Investment Management Agreements, except for the term and escrow provisions described below. The Interim Investment Management Agreement will continue in effect for a term ending on the earlier of February 28, 2015 (150 days following the closing of the Transaction) or when shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement. Pursuant to Rule 15a-4 under the 1940 Act, compensation earned by the Adviser under an Interim Investment Management Agreement will be held in an interest-bearing escrow account. If shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement prior to February 28, 2015, the amount held in the escrow account under the Interim Investment Management Agreement will be paid to the Adviser. If shareholdersmembers of such committees; however, in general, such fees will be $1,000 per meeting for attendance in person or by telephone at ad hoc committee meetings where in-person attendance is required and $500 per meeting for attendance by telephone or in person at such meetings where in-person attendance is not required. The annual retainer, fees and expenses are allocated among the Nuveen funds on the basis of relative net assets, although management may, in its discretion, establish a minimum amount to be allocated to each fund. In certain instances fees and expenses will be allocated only to those Nuveen funds that are discussed at a given meeting.

11

The Funds do not have retirement or pension plans. Certain Nuveen funds (the “Participating Funds”) participate in a deferred compensation plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) that permits an Independent Board Member to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of his or her compensation as an Independent Board Member. The deferred compensation of a participating Independent Board Member is credited to a book reserve account of the Participating Fund dowhen the compensation would otherwise have been paid to such Independent Board Member. The value of the Independent Board Member’s deferral account at any time is equal to the value that the account would have had if contributions to the account had been invested and reinvested in shares of one or more of the eligible Nuveen funds. At the time for commencing distributions from an Independent Board Member’s deferral account, the Independent Board Member may elect to receive distributions in a lump sum or over a period of five years. The Participating Fund will not approvebe liable for any other fund’s obligations to make distributions under the New Investment Management Agreement priorDeferred Compensation Plan.

The tables set forth in Appendix C show, for each Independent Board Member, the aggregate compensation paid by each Fund to February 28, 2015,each Board Member for its last fiscal year and the aggregate compensation paid by all Nuveen funds to each Board Member for the calendar year ended December 31, 2019.

The Corporation has no employees. Each officer of the Corporation serves without any compensation from the Funds. The CCO’s compensation, which is composed of base salary and incentive compensation, is paid by the Adviser, will be paidwith review and input by the lesserBoard. Each Fund reimburses the Adviser for an allocable portion of its costs incurred in performing its services under the Interim Investment Management Agreement orAdviser’s cost of the total amount inCCO’s incentive compensation.

Board Leadership and Risk Oversight

The Board of each Fund oversees the escrow account, plus interest earned. If shareholders do not approve the New Investment Management Agreement, Nuveen Fund Advisors will no longer be able to act as the Fund’s adviser after February 28, 2015operations and the Board will take such action as it deems to be in the best interestmanagement of the Fund, including potentially liquidating the Fund.

Section 15(f)duties performed for the Fund by the Adviser. The Board has adopted a unitary board structure. A unitary board consists of one group of directors who serve on the board of every fund in the complex. In adopting a unitary board structure, the Board Members seek to provide effective governance through establishing a board, the overall composition of which will, as a body, possess the appropriate skills, independence and experience to oversee the Funds’ business. With this overall framework in mind, when the Board, through its Nominating and Governance Committee discussed below, seeks nominees for the Board, the Board Members consider, not only the candidate’s particular background, skills and experience, among other things, but also whether such background, skills and experience enhance the Board’s diversity and at the same time complement the Board given its current composition and the mix of skills and experiences of the incumbent Board Members. The Nominating and Governance Committee believes that the Board generally benefits from diversity of background, experience and views among its members, and considers this a factor in evaluating the composition of the Board, but has not adopted any specific policy on diversity or any particular definition of diversity.

The Transaction has been structured in reliance upon Section 15(f)Board believes the unitary board structure enhances good and effective governance, particularly given the nature of the 1940 Act. Section 15(f) provides in substance that when a sale of a controlling interest in an investment adviser occurs, the investment adviser or any of its affiliated persons may receive any amount or benefit in connection with the sale so long as two conditions are satisfied. The first condition of Section 15(f) is that, during the three-year period following the consummation of a transaction, at least 75%structure of the investment company’s board of directors must not be “interested persons” (as definedcompany complex. Funds in the 1940 Act)same complex generally are served by the same service providers and personnel and are governed by the same regulatory scheme which raises common issues that must be addressed by the Board Members across the fund complex (such as compliance, valuation, liquidity, brokerage, trade allocation or risk management). The Board believes it is more efficient to have a

12

single board review and oversee common policies and procedures which increases the Board’s knowledge and expertise with respect to the many aspects of fund operations that are complex-wide in nature. The unitary structure also enhances the Board’s influence and oversight over the Adviser and other service providers.

In an effort to enhance the independence of the Board, the Board also has a Chair that is an Independent Board Member. The Board recognizes that a chair can perform an important role in setting the agenda for the Board, establishing the boardroom culture, establishing a point person on behalf of the Board for Fund management, and reinforcing the Board’s focus on the long-term interests of shareholders. The Board recognizes that a chair may be able to better perform these functions without any conflicts of interests arising from a position with Fund management. Accordingly, the Board Members have elected Terrence J. Toth as the independent Chair of the Board. Specific responsibilities of the Chair include: (i) presiding at all meetings of the Board and of the shareholders; (ii) seeing that all orders and resolutions of the Board Members are carried into effect; and (iii) maintaining records of and, whenever necessary, certifying all proceedings of the Board Members and the shareholders.

Although the Board has direct responsibility over various matters (such as advisory contracts, underwriting contracts and Fund performance), the Board also exercises certain of its oversight responsibilities through several committees that it has established and which report back to the full Board. The Board believes that a committee structure is an effective means to permit Board Members to focus on particular operations or issues affecting the Funds, including risk oversight. More specifically, with respect to risk oversight, the Board has delegated matters relating to valuation and compliance to certain committees (as summarized below) as well as certain aspects of investment adviserrisk. In addition, the Board believes that the periodic rotation of Board Members among the different committees allows the Board Members to gain additional and different perspectives of a Fund’s operations. The Board has established six standing committees: the Executive Committee, the Dividend Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Open-End Funds Committee. The Board may also from time to time create ad hoc committees to focus on particular issues as the need arises. The membership and functions of the standing committees are summarized below.

Executive Committee. The Executive Committee, which meets between regular meetings of the Board, is authorized to exercise all of the powers of the Board. The members of the Executive Committee are Terence J. Toth, Chair, Albin F. Moschner and Margaret L. Wolff. The number of Executive Committee meetings of the Corporation held during the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 is shown in Appendix D.

Audit Committee. The Audit Committee assists the Board in the oversight and monitoring of the accounting and reporting policies, processes and practices of the Nuveen funds, and the audits of the financial statements of the Nuveen funds; the quality and integrity of the financial statements of the Nuveen funds; the Nuveen funds’ compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to the Nuveen funds’ financial statements; the independent auditors’ qualifications, performance and independence; and the pricing procedures of the Nuveen funds and the Adviser’s internal valuation group. It is the responsibility of the Audit Committee to select, evaluate and replace any independent auditors (subject only to Board and, if applicable, shareholder ratification) and to determine their compensation. The Audit Committee is also responsible for, among other things, overseeing the valuation of securities comprising the Nuveen funds’ portfolios. Subject to the Board’s general supervision of such actions,

13

the Audit Committee addresses any valuation issues, oversees the Nuveen funds’ pricing procedures and actions taken by the Adviser’s internal valuation group which provides regular reports to the committee, reviews any issues relating to the valuation of the Nuveen funds’ securities brought to its attention and considers the risks to the Nuveen funds in assessing the possible resolutions to these matters. The Audit Committee may also consider any financial risk exposures for the Nuveen funds in conjunction with performing its functions.

To fulfill its oversight duties, the Audit Committee receives annual and semi-annual reports and has regular meetings with the external auditors for the Nuveen funds and the Adviser’s internal audit group. The Audit Committee also may review in a general manner the processes the Board or predecessor adviser. Eachother Board committees have in place with respect to risk assessment and risk management as well as compliance with legal and regulatory matters relating to the Nuveen funds’ financial statements. The committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. Members of the Audit Committee shall be independent (as set forth in the charter) and free of any relationship that, in the opinion of the directors, would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment as an Audit Committee member. The members of the Audit Committee are Carole E. Stone, Chair, Jack B. Evans, William C. Hunter, John K. Nelson and Judith M. Stockdale, each of whom is an Independent Board Member of the Funds. A copy of the Charter is available at www.nuveen.com/MutualFunds/ShareholderResources/FundGovernance.aspx. The number of Audit Committee meetings of the Corporation held during the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 is shown in Appendix D.

Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for seeking, identifying and recommending to the Board qualified candidates for election or appointment to the Board. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee oversees matters of corporate governance, including the evaluation of Board performance and processes, the assignment and rotation of committee members, and the establishment of corporate governance guidelines and procedures, to the extent necessary or desirable, and matters related thereto. Although the unitary and committee structure has been developed over the years and the Nominating and Governance Committee believes the structure has provided efficient and effective governance, the committee recognizes that as demands on the Board evolve over time (such as through an increase in the number of funds overseen or an increase in the complexity of the issues raised), the committee must continue to evaluate the Board and committee structures and their processes and modify the foregoing as may be necessary or appropriate to continue to provide effective governance. Accordingly, the Nominating and Governance Committee has a separate meeting each year to, among other things, review the Board and committee structures, their performance and functions, and recommend any modifications thereto or alternative structures or processes that would enhance the Board’s governance of the Nuveen funds.

In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee, among other things, makes recommendations concerning the continuing education of directors; monitors performance of legal counsel and other service providers; establishes and monitors a process by which security holders are able to communicate in writing with members of the Board; and periodically reviews and makes recommendations about any appropriate changes to trustee or director compensation. In the event of a vacancy on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee receives suggestions from various sources, including shareholders, as to suitable candidates. Suggestions should be sent in writing to William Siffermann, Manager of Fund Board Relations, Nuveen Investments, Inc., 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606. The Nominating

14

and Governance Committee sets appropriate standards and requirements for nominations for new directors and reserves the right to interview any and all candidates and to make the final selection of any new directors. In considering a candidate’s qualifications, each candidate must meet certain basic requirements, including relevant skills and experience, time availability (including the time requirements for due diligence site visits to sub-advisers and service providers) and, if qualifying as an independent director candidate, independence from the Adviser, Nuveen Asset Management LLC, the Funds’ sub-adviser, Nuveen Securities, LLC, the Funds’ distributor (the “Distributor”), and other service providers, including any affiliates of these entities. These skill and experience requirements may vary depending on the current composition of the Board, since the goal is to ensure an appropriate range of skills, diversity and experience, in the aggregate. Accordingly, the particular factors considered and weight given to these factors will depend on the composition of the Board and the skills and backgrounds of the incumbent director at the time of consideration of the nominees. All candidates, however, must meet high expectations of personal integrity, independence, governance experience and professional competence. All candidates must be willing to be critical within the Board and with management and yet maintain a collegial and collaborative manner toward other Board members. The committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board, a copy of which is available on the Funds’ website at www.nuveen.com/MutualFunds/ShareholderResources/FundGovernance.aspx. This committee is composed of Independent Board Members. The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Terence J. Toth, Chair, Jack B. Evans, William C. Hunter, Albin F. Moschner, John K. Nelson, Judith M. Stockdale, Carole E. Stone, Margaret L. Wolff and Robert L. Young. The number of Nominating and Governance Committee meetings of the Corporation held during the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 is shown in Appendix D.

Dividend Committee. The Dividend Committee is authorized to declare distributions on each Fund’s shares including, but not limited to, regular and special dividends, capital gains and ordinary income distributions. The members of the Dividend Committee are Robert L. Young, Chair, William C. Hunter, Albin F. Moschner and Margaret L. Wolff. The number of Dividend Committee meetings of the Corporation held during the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 is shown in Appendix D.

Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee. The Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee (the “Compliance Committee”) is responsible for the oversight of compliance issues, risk management and other regulatory matters affecting the Funds that are not otherwise under or within the jurisdiction of the other committees. The Board has adopted and periodically reviews policies and procedures designed to address the Funds’ compliance and risk matters. As part of its duties, the Compliance Committee: reviews the policies and procedures relating to compliance matters and recommends modifications thereto as necessary or appropriate to the full Board; develops new policies and procedures as new regulatory matters affecting the Funds arise from time to time; evaluates or considers any comments or reports from examinations from regulatory authorities and responses thereto; and performs any special reviews, investigations or other oversight responsibilities relating to risk management, compliance and/or regulatory matters as requested by the Board.

In addition, the Compliance Committee is responsible for risk oversight, including, but not limited to, the oversight of risks related to investments and operations. Such risks include, among other things, exposures to: particular issuers, market sectors, or types of securities; risks

15

related to product structure elements, such as leverage; and techniques that may be used to address those risks, such as hedging and swaps. In assessing issues brought to the Compliance Committee’s attention or in reviewing a particular policy, procedure, investment technique or strategy, the Compliance Committee evaluates the risks to the Funds in adopting a particular approach or resolution compared to the anticipated benefits to the Funds and their shareholders. In fulfilling its obligations, the Compliance Committee meets on a quarterly basis, and at least once a year in person. The Compliance Committee receives written and oral reports from the Funds’ CCO and meets privately with the CCO at each of its quarterly meetings. The CCO also provides an annual report to the full Board regarding the operations of the Funds’ and other service providers’ compliance programs as well as any recommendations for modifications thereto. The Compliance Committee also receives reports from the investment services group of Nuveen regarding various investment risks. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the full Board also participates in discussions with management regarding certain matters relating to investment risk, such as the use of leverage and hedging. The investment services group therefore also reports to the full Board at its quarterly meetings regarding, among other things, Fund performance and the various drivers of such performance. Accordingly, the Board directly and/or in conjunction with the Compliance Committee oversees matters relating to investment risks. Matters not addressed at the committee level are addressed directly by the full Board. The Compliance Committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. The members of the Compliance Committee are John K. Nelson, Chair, Albin F. Moschner, Terence J. Toth, Margaret L. Wolff and Robert L. Young. The number of Compliance Committee meetings of the Corporation held during the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 is shown in Appendix D.

Open-End Funds Committee. The Open-End Funds Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in the oversight and monitoring of the Nuveen funds that are registered as open-end management investment companies (“Open-End Funds”). The committee may review and evaluate matters related to the formation and the initial presentation to the Board of any new Open-End Fund and may review and evaluate any matters relating to any existing Open-End Fund. The committee operates under a written charter adopted and approved by the Board. The members of the Open-End Funds Committee are Albin F. Moschner, Chair, William C. Hunter, John K. Nelson, Judith M. Stockdale and Terence J. Toth. The number of Open-End Funds Committee meetings of the Corporation held during the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 is shown in Appendix D.

Number of Board Meetings. The number of regular quarterly meetings and special meetings held by the Board of the Corporation held during the calendar year ended December 31, 2019 is shown in Appendix D.

Board Member Attendance. During the calendar year ended December 31, 2019, each Board Member attended 75% or more of each Fund’s Board meetings and the committee meetings (if a member thereof) held during the period for which such Board Member was a Board Member. The policy of the Board relating to attendance by Board Members at shareholder meetings of the Funds currently meets this test. Second, an “unfair burden” (as definedis posted on the Funds’ website at www.nuveen.com/en-us/products/fund-governance.

16

Board Diversification and Board Member Qualifications

In determining that a particular nominee was qualified to serve on the Board, the Board considered each nominee’s background, skills, experience and other attributes in light of the composition of the Board with no particular factor controlling. The Board believes that Board Members need to have the ability to critically review, evaluate, question and discuss information provided to them, and to interact effectively with Fund management, service providers and counsel, in order to exercise effective business judgment in the 1940 Act, including any interpretationsperformance of their duties, and the Board believes each nominee satisfies this standard. An effective Board Member may achieve this ability through his or no-action lettersher educational background; business, professional training or practice; public service or academic positions; experience from service as a board member or executive of investment funds, public companies or significant private or not-for-profit entities or other organizations; and/or other life experiences. Accordingly, set forth below is a summary of the experiences, qualifications, attributes, and skills that led to the conclusion, as of the date of this document, that each nominee should serve as a Board Member. References to the experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills of each nominee are pursuant to requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, (the “SEC”) or the staff of the SEC) must not be imposed on the investment company as a result of the transaction relating to the sale of such interest, or any express or implied terms, conditions or understandings applicable thereto. The term “unfair burden” (as defined in the

5

1940 Act) includes any arrangement, during the two-year period after the transaction, whereby the investment adviser (or predecessor or successor adviser), or any “interested person” (as defined in the 1940 Act) of such an adviser, receives or is entitled to receive any compensation, directly or indirectly, from the investment company or its security holders (other than fees for bona fide investment advisory or other services) or from any person in connection with the purchase or sale of securities or other property to, from or on behalf of the investment company (other than bona fide ordinary compensation as principal underwriter for the investment company). Under the Transaction Agreement, TIAA-CREF acknowledges the sellers’ reliance on Section 15(f) of the 1940 Act and has agreed that it will, and will cause its affiliates to, use commercially reasonable efforts to enable the provisions of Section 15(f) to be true in relation to the Funds.

To prevent the occurrence of an “unfair burden” under Section 15(f), Nuveen has committed, for a period of two years from the date of the closing of the Transaction, (i) not to increase contractual management fee rates for any Fund; and (ii) not to raise expense cap levels for any Fund from levels that were in effect or scheduled to go into effect prior to the Transaction. This commitment shall not limit or otherwise affect mergers or liquidations of any Funds in the ordinary course.

Comparison of Original Investment Management Agreement, Interim Investment Management Agreement and New Investment Management Agreement

The terms of each New Investment Management Agreement, including fees payable to the Adviser by the Fund thereunder, are substantially identical to those of the Original Investment Management Agreement, except for the date of effectiveness, and to those of the Interim Investment Management Agreement, except for the term and escrow provisions described below. There is no change in the fee rate payable by each Fund to the Adviser. If approved by shareholders of a Fund, the New Investment Management Agreement for each Fund will expire on August 1, 2015, unless continued. Each New Investment Management Agreement will continue in effect from year to year thereafter if such continuance is approved for the Fund at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. Below is a comparison of certain terms of the Original Investment Management Agreements and the Interim Investment Management Agreements to the terms of the New Investment Management Agreements.

Investment Management Services. The investment management services to be provided by the Adviser to each Fund under the New Investment Management Agreements will be identical to those services previously provided by the Adviser to each Fund under the Original Investment Management Agreements and currently provided under the Interim Investment Management Agreements. The Original Investment Management Agreements, the Interim Investment Management Agreements and the New Investment Management Agreements provide that the Adviser shall manage the investment and reinvestment of the Fund’s assets in accordance with the Fund’s investment objective and policies and limitations and administer the Fund’s affairs to the extent requested by and subject to the oversight of the Fund’s Board. In addition, the investment management services are expected to be provided by the same Adviser personnel under the New Investment Management Agreements as under the Original Investment Management Agreements and currently provided under the Interim Investment

6

Management Agreements. The Adviser does not anticipate that the Transaction will have any adverse effect on the performance of its obligations under the New Investment Management Agreements.

Fees. Under each Original Investment Management Agreement, Interim Investment Management Agreement and New Investment Management Agreement, the Fund pays to the Adviser an investment management fee that consists of two components: a fund-level fee, based only on the amount of assets within a Fund, and a complex-level fee, based on the aggregate amount of all eligible fund assets managed by Nuveen Fund Advisors. The complex-level fee rate is also dependent on the percentage of that Fund’s assets that are “eligible assets,” as described inAppendix C. This pricing structure enables Fund shareholders to benefit from growth in the assets within the Fund as well as (to the extent that the Fund’s assets are eligible assets) from growth in the amount of complex-wide assets managed by the Adviser. Each Fund’s fee schedule under the New Investment Management Agreement for such Fund is identical to the fee schedule under the Original Investment Management Agreement and the Interim Investment Management Agreement.

Each Fund’s annual fund-level fee, payable monthly, is based upon the average daily net assets of each Fund pursuant to the fee schedule set forth inAppendix C. The fund-level fee schedule is identical under each Fund’s Original Investment Management Agreement, Interim Investment Management Agreement and New Investment Management Agreement.

The overall complex-level fee begins at a maximum rate of 0.2000% of each Fund’s average daily net assets, based upon complex-level assets of $55 billion, with breakpoints for eligible assets above that level pursuant to the complex-level fee schedule set forth onAppendix C. The complex-level fee schedule is identical under each Fund’s Original Investment Management Agreement, Interim Investment Management Agreement and New Investment Management Agreement.

Each Fund’s net assets as of December 31, 2013, fund-specific complex-level fee rate as of December 31, 2013, effective management fee rate (net of fee waivers and expense reimbursements) as a percentage of average daily net assets for the Fund’s last fiscal year and fees paid to the Adviser during the Fund’s last fiscal year are also set forth inAppendix C.

Compensation earned by Nuveen Fund Advisors under an Interim Investment Management Agreement will be held in an interest-bearing escrow account. If shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement prior to February 28, 2015, the amount held in the escrow account will be paid to Nuveen Fund Advisors. If shareholders of a Fund do not approve the New Investment Management Agreement prior to February 28, 2015, Nuveen Fund Advisors will be paid the lesser of its costs incurred in performing its services under the interim agreements or the total amount in the escrow account, plus interest earned.

Other Services. Under each Original Investment Management Agreement, each Interim Investment Management Agreement and each New Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser shall furnish office facilities and equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and administrative services (other than such services, if any, provided by the Fund’s transfer agent or other service providers) for the Fund.

Limitation on Liability. The Original Investment Management Agreements, Interim Investment Management Agreements and New Investment Management Agreements provide that the Adviser will not be liable for any loss sustained by reason of the purchase, sale or retention of

7

any security, whether or not such purchase, sale or retention shall have been based upon the investigation and research made by any other individual, firm or corporation, if such recommendation shall have been selected with due care and in good faith, except loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of the Adviser in the performance of its obligations and duties, or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the agreement.

Continuance. The Original Investment Management Agreement of each Fund originally was in effect for an initial term and could be continued thereafter for successive one-year periods if such continuance was specifically approved at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act. If the shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement for that Fund, the New Investment Management Agreement will expire on August 1, 2015, unless continued. The New Investment Management Agreement may be continued for successive one-year periods if approved at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act. Each Interim Investment Management Agreement will continue in effect for a term ending on the earlier of February 28, 2015 (150 days following the closing of the Transaction) or when shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement.

Termination. The Original Investment Management Agreement and New Investment Management Agreement for each Fund provide that the agreement may be terminated at any time with respect to a Fund without the payment of any penalty by the Fund or Adviser on sixty (60) days’ written notice to the other party. Each Interim Investment Management Agreement may be terminated without the payment of any penalty by the Adviser on sixty (60) days’ written notice to the Fund or by the Fund on ten (10) days’ written notice to the Adviser. A Fund may effect termination by action ofconstitute holding out the Board or any nominee as having any special expertise or experience and shall not impose any greater responsibility or liability on any such person or on the Board by vote of a majorityreason thereof.

Jack B. Evans. Mr. Evans has served as Chairman (since 2019) and President (1996-2019) of the outstanding voting securitiesHall-Perrine Foundation, a private philanthropic corporation. Mr. Evans was formerly President and Chief Operating Officer of the Fund, accompanied by appropriate notice.

Information about the Adviser

Nuveen Fund Advisors,SCI Financial Group, Inc., a registered investment adviser, is organized asregional financial services firm headquartered in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. He was a Delaware limited liability company and is a wholly-owned subsidiarymember of Nuveen. Founded in 1898, Nuveen and its affiliates had approximately $231.1 billion in assets under management as of June 30, 2014. Nuveen Fund Advisors offers advisory and investment management services to a broad range of mutual fund and closed-end fund clients. Nuveen Fund Advisors is responsible for each Fund’s overall investment strategy and its implementation. Nuveen Fund Advisors also is responsible for managing each Fund’s business affairs and providing certain clerical, bookkeeping and other administrative services. The business address of Nuveen Fund Advisors and Nuveen is 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

Certain information regarding the executive officer and directors of Nuveen Fund Advisors is set forth inAppendix F.

Nuveen Securities, LLC (the “Distributor”), 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606, an affiliate of the Adviser, serves as the distributor for the Funds’ shares. The Funds pay distribution and service fees to the Distributor, all or a portion of which may be used by the Distributor to compensate financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution of shares and the provision of ongoing account services to shareholders. Information regarding the fees paid by each Fund to the Distributor during the Fund’s last fiscal year is set forth inAppendix C.

8

Shareholder Approval

To become effective with respect to a particular Fund, the New Investment Management Agreement must be approved by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund, with all classes of shares voting together as a single class. The “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” is defined in the 1940 Act as the lesser of the vote of (i) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund entitled to vote thereon present at the meeting if the holders of more than 50% of such outstanding shares are present in person or represented by proxy; or (ii) more than 50% of such outstanding shares of the Fund entitled to vote thereon. For purposes of determining the approval of the New Investment Management Agreement, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as shares voted against the proposal.

Each New Investment Management Agreement was approved by the Board of the respective FundFederal Reserve Bank of Chicago as well as a Director of Alliant Energy and President Pro Tem of the Board of Regents for the State of Iowa University System. Mr. Evans is Chairman of the Board of United Fire Group, sits on the Board of the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery as a Public Member Director (since 2015) and is a Life Trustee of Coe College. He has a Bachelor of Arts from Coe College and a M.B.A. from the University of Iowa.

William C. Hunter. Dr. Hunter became Dean Emeritus of the Henry B. Tippie College of Business at the University of Iowa in 2012, after considerationhaving served as Dean of all factorsthe College since July 2006. He had been Dean and Distinguished Professor of Finance at the University of Connecticut School of Business from 2003 to 2006. From 1995 to 2003, he was the Senior Vice President and Director of Research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. He has held faculty positions at Emory University, Atlanta University, the University of Georgia and Northwestern University. He has consulted with numerous foreign central banks and official agencies in Europe, Asia, Central America and South America. He has been a Director of Wellmark, Inc. since 2009. He is a past Director (2005-2015) and a past President (2010-2014) of Beta Gamma Sigma, Inc., The International Business Honor Society and a past Director (2004-2018) of the Xerox Corporation.

Albin F. Moschner. Mr. Moschner is a consultant in the wireless industry and, in July 2012, founded Northcroft Partners, LLC, a management consulting firm that provides operational, management and governance solutions. Prior to founding Northcroft Partners, LLC, Mr. Moschner held various positions at Leap Wireless International, Inc., a provider of wireless services, where he was a consultant from February 2011 to July 2012, Chief Operating Officer from July 2008 to February 2011, and Chief Marketing Officer from August 2004 to

17

June 2008. Before he joined Leap Wireless International, Inc., Mr. Moschner was President of the Verizon Card Services division of Verizon Communications, Inc. from 2000 to 2003, and President of One Point Services at One Point Communications from 1999 to 2000. Mr. Moschner also served at Zenith Electronics Corporation as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer from 1995 to 1996, and as Director, President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to 1995. Mr. Moschner has been Chairman of the Board (2019) and a member of the Board of Directors (2012-2019) of USA Technologies, Inc. and, from 1996 until 2016, he was a member of the Board of Directors of Wintrust Financial Corporation. In addition, he is emeritus (since 2018) of the Advisory Boards of the Kellogg School of Management (1995-2018) and the Archdiocese of Chicago Financial Council (2012-2018). Mr. Moschner received a Bachelor of Engineering degree in Electrical Engineering from The City College of New York in 1974 and a Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University in 1979.

John K. Nelson. Mr. Nelson is on the Board of Directors of Core12, LLC (since 2008), a private firm that develops branding, marketing, and communications strategies for clients. Mr. Nelson has extensive experience in global banking and markets, having served in several senior executive positions with ABN AMRO Holdings N.V. and its affiliated entities and predecessors, including LaSalle Bank Corporation from 1996 to 2008, ultimately serving as Chief Executive Officer of ABN AMRO N.V. North America. During his tenure at the bank, he also served as Global Head of its Financial Markets Division, which it determinedencompassed the bank’s Currency, Commodity, Fixed Income, Emerging Markets, and Derivatives businesses. He was a member of the Foreign Exchange Committee of the Federal Reserve Bank of the United States and during his tenure with ABN AMRO served as the bank’s representative on various committees of The Bank of Canada, European Central Bank, and The Bank of England. Mr. Nelson previously served as a senior, external advisor to be relevant to its deliberations, including those discussed after proposal 2 below.the financial services practice of Deloitte Consulting LLP (2012-2014). At Fordham University, he served as a director of The President’s Council (2010-2019) and previously served as a director of The Curran Center for Catholic American Studies (2009-2018). He served as a trustee and Chairman of The Board of eachTrustees of Marian University (2011-2013). Mr. Nelson is a graduate of Fordham University and holds a BA in Economics (1984) and an MBA in Finance (1991).

Judith M. Stockdale. Ms. Stockdale retired in 2012 as Executive Director of the Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation, a private foundation working in land conservation and artistic vitality in the Chicago region and the Low Country of South Carolina. She is currently a board member of the Land Trust Alliance (since 2013). Her previous positions include Executive Director of the Great Lakes Protection Fund, also determined to submitExecutive Director of Openlands, and Senior Staff Associate at the Fund’s New Investment Management AgreementChicago Community Trust. She has served on the Advisory Councils of the National Zoological Park, the Governor’s Science Advisory Council (Illinois), and the Nancy Ryerson Ranney Leadership Grants Program. She has served on the boards of Brushwood Center, Forefront f/k/a Donors Forum and the U.S. Endowment for consideration byForestry and Communities. Ms. Stockdale, a native of the shareholdersUnited Kingdom, has a Bachelor of such Fund.Science degree in geography from the University of Durham (UK) and a Master of Forest Science degree from Yale University.

TheCarole E. Stone. Ms. Stone recently retired from the Board of each Fund unanimously recommends that shareholdersDirectors of the Fund vote FOR approvalCboe Global Markets, Inc. (formerly, CBOE Holdings, Inc.), having served from 2010-2020. She previously served on the Boards of the Chicago Board Options Exchange and C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated. Ms. Stone retired from the New York State Division of the Budget in 2004, having served as its Director for nearly five years and as Deputy Director from 1995 through 1999.

18

She has also served as the Chair of the New York Racing Association Oversight Board, as a Commissioner on the New York State Commission on Public Authority Reform and as a member of the Boards of Directors of several New York State public authorities. Ms. Stone has a Bachelor of Arts from Skidmore College in Business Administration.

Matthew Thornton III. Mr. Thornton has over 40 years of broad leadership and operating experience from his career with FedEx Corporation (“FedEx”), which, through its portfolio of companies, provides transportation, e-commerce and business services. In November 2019, Mr. Thornton retired as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of FedEx Freight Corporation (FedEx Freight), a subsidiary of FedEx, where, from May 2018 until his retirement, he had been responsible for day-to-day operations, strategic guidance, modernization of freight operations and delivering innovative customer solutions. From September 2006 to May 2018, Mr. Thornton served as Senior Vice President, U.S. Operations at Federal Express Corporation (FedEx Express), a subsidiary of FedEx. Prior to September 2006, Mr. Thornton held a range of positions of increasing responsibility with FedEx, including various management positions. In addition, Mr. Thornton currently (since 2014) serves on the Board of Directors of The Sherwin-Williams Company, where he is a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Formerly (2012-2018), he was a member of the Board of Directors of Safe Kids Worldwide^®, a non-profit organization dedicated to the prevention of childhood injuries. Mr. Thornton is a member (since 2014) of the Executive Leadership Council (ELC), the nation’s premier organization of global black senior executives. He is also a member of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD). Mr. Thornton has been recognized by Black Enterprise on its 2017 list of the Most Powerful Executives in Corporate America and by Ebony on its 2016 Power 100 list of the world’s most influential and inspiring African Americans. Mr. Thornton received a B.B.A. degree from the University of Memphis in 1980 and an M.B.A. from the University of Tennessee in 2001.

Terence J. Toth. Mr. Toth, the Nuveen funds’ Independent Chair, was a Co-Founding Partner of Promus Capital (2008-2017). From 2010 to 2019, he was a Director of Fulcrum IT Service LLC and from 2012 to 2016, he was a Director of LogicMark LLC. From 2008 to 2013, he was a Director of Legal & General Investment Management Agreement.America, Inc. From 2004 to 2007, he was Chief Executive Officer and President of Northern Trust Global Investments, and Executive Vice President of Quantitative Management & Securities Lending from 2000 to 2004. He also formerly served on the Board of the Northern Trust Mutual Funds. He joined Northern Trust in 1994 after serving as Managing Director and Head of Global Securities Lending at Bankers Trust (1986 to 1994) and Head of Government Trading and Cash Collateral Investment at Northern Trust from 1982 to 1986. He currently serves on the Board of Quality Control Corporation (since 2012) and Catalyst Schools of Chicago (since 2008). He is on the Mather Foundation Board (since 2012) and is the Chair of its Investment Committee. Mr. Toth graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Illinois, and received his M.B.A. from New York University. In 2005, he graduated from the CEO Perspectives Program at Northwestern University.

Margaret L. Wolff. Ms. Wolff retired from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP in 2014 after more than 30 years of providing client service in the Mergers & Acquisitions Group. During her legal career, Ms. Wolff devoted significant time to advising boards and senior management on U.S. and international corporate, securities, regulatory and strategic matters, including governance, shareholder, fiduciary, operational and management issues. From 2013 to 2017, she was a Board member of Travelers Insurance Company of Canada and The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company (each of which is a part of Travelers Canada, the

919

Canadian operation of The Travelers Companies, Inc.). Ms. Wolff has been a trustee of New York-Presbyterian Hospital since 2005 and, since 2004, she has served as a trustee of The John A. Hartford Foundation (a philanthropy dedicated to improving the care of older adults) where she currently is the Chair. From 2005 to 2015, she was a trustee of Mt. Holyoke College and served as Vice Chair of the Board from 2011 to 2015. Ms. Wolff received her Bachelor of Arts from Mt. Holyoke College and her Juris Doctor from Case Western Reserve University School of Law.

Robert L. Young. Mr. Young has more than 30 years of experience in the investment management industry. From 1997 to 2017, he held various positions with J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (“J.P. Morgan Investment”) and its affiliates (collectively, “J.P. Morgan”). Most recently, he served as Chief Operating Officer and Director of J.P. Morgan Investment (from 2010 to 2016) and as President and Principal Executive Officer of the J.P. Morgan Funds (from 2013 to 2016). As Chief Operating Officer of J.P. Morgan Investment, Mr. Young led service, administration and business platform support activities for J.P. Morgan’s domestic retail mutual fund and institutional commingled and separate account businesses, and co-led these activities for J.P. Morgan’s global retail and institutional investment management businesses. As President of the J.P. Morgan Funds, Mr. Young interacted with various service providers to these funds, facilitated the relationship between such funds and their boards, and was directly involved in establishing board agendas, addressing regulatory matters, and establishing policies and procedures. Before joining J.P. Morgan, Mr. Young, a former Certified Public Accountant (CPA), was a Senior Manager (Audit) with Deloitte & Touche LLP (formerly, Touche Ross LLP), where he was employed from 1985 to 1996. During his tenure there, he actively participated in creating, and ultimately led, the firm’s midwestern mutual fund practice. Mr. Young holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in Accounting from the University of Dayton and, from 2008 to 2011, he served on the Investment Committee of its Board of Trustees.

Independent Chair

Terrence J. Toth currently serves as the independent Chair of the Board. Specific responsibilities of the Chair include: (a) presiding at all meetings of the Board and of the shareholders; (b) seeing that all orders and resolutions of the Board Members are carried into effect; and (c) maintaining records of and, whenever necessary, certifying all proceedings of the Board Members and the shareholders.

20

PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF NEW SUB-ADVISORY AGREEMENTSThe Officers

Background

Prior to the closing of the Transaction, NAM served as each Fund’s sub-adviser under an investment sub-advisory agreement between Nuveen Fund Advisors and NAMThe following table sets forth information with respect to each Fund (each, an “Original Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively,officer of the “Original Sub-Advisory Agreements”).Funds. Officers receive no compensation from the Funds. The date of each Original Sub-Advisory Agreement and the date it was last approved by shareholders and approved for continuanceofficers are elected by the Board on an annual basis to serve until successors are provided inAppendix Delected and qualified.

21

22

23

24

25

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

As with the Original Investment Management Agreements, each Original Sub-Advisory Agreement, as required by Section 15 of the 1940 Act, provided for its automatic termination in the event of its assignment. The completion of the Transaction resulted in a change in control of NAM, which is a subsidiary of Nuveen, and therefore was deemed an assignment of each Original Sub-Advisory Agreement. In addition, each Original Sub-Advisory Agreement provided that it would terminate upon the termination of the Original Investment Management Agreement with respect to such Fund. As a result, the completion of the Transaction resulted in the termination of each Original Sub-Advisory Agreement.

In anticipation of the Transaction, the Board met at a series of joint meetings, including meetings of the full Board and meetings of the Independent Board Members separately, commencing in February 2014have unanimously selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the books and concluding at the Board’s April 30, 2014 in person meeting for purposes of, among other things, considering whether it would be in the best interestsrecords of each Fund for each Fund’s current fiscal year.

A representative of PwC will be present at the Meeting to approvemake a new sub-advisory agreement betweenstatement, if such representative so desires, and to respond to shareholders’ questions. PwC has informed each applicable Fund that it has no direct or indirect material financial interest in the Funds, Nuveen, Fund Advisors and the Sub-Adviser (each a “New Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively, the “New Sub-Advisory Agreements”). The form of the New Sub-Advisory Agreement is attached hereto asAppendix J.

The 1940 Act requires that each New Sub-Advisory Agreement be approved by the Fund’s shareholders in order for it to become effective. At the April 30, 2014 Board meeting, and for the reasons discussed below (see “Board Considerations”), the Board, including a majority of the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the continuation of the Original Sub-Advisory Agreement and approved the New Sub-Advisory Agreement on behalf of each Fund and unanimously recommended approval of the New Sub-Advisory Agreement by shareholders.

Because each New Sub-Advisory Agreement, like each Original Sub-Advisory Agreement, is between the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser, a Fund’s New Sub-Advisory Agreement will not take effect until the New Investment Management Agreement for such Fund has been approvedor any other investment company sponsored by shareholders.

Because the Funds were unable to achieve attendance, in person or by proxy, of a sufficient number of shareholders to approve the proposals at the August Meeting and any adjournments thereof, shareholders of each Fund were unable approve the New Sub-Advisory Agreement prior to the closing of the Transaction. Therefore an interim sub-advisory agreement between the Adviser and NAM with respect to each Fund (each, an “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively, the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) took effect on October 1, 2014 upon the closing of the Transaction. At the April 30, 2014 meeting, the Board, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved an Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements for each Fund in order to ensure continuity of sub-advisory services to the Funds after the Transaction. The termsNuveen.

1026

of each Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement are substantially identical to those of the Original Sub-Advisory AgreementsAudit and New Sub-Advisory Agreements, except for the term and escrow provisions described below. The Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement will continue in effect for a term ending on the earlier of February 28, 2015 (150 days from the closing of the Transaction) or when shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement. Pursuant to Rule 15a-4 under the 1940 Act, compensation earned by the Sub-Adviser under an Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement will be held in an interest-bearing escrow account. If shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement prior to February 28, 2015, the amount held in the escrow account under the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement will be paid to theSub-Adviser. If shareholders of a Fund do not approve the New Investment Management Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement prior to February 28, 2015, theSub-Adviser will be paid the lesser of its costs incurred in performing its services under the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement or the total amount in the escrow account, plus interest earned. If shareholders do not approve the New Investment Management Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement, NAM will no longer be able to act as the Fund’s sub-adviser after February 28, 2015 and the Board will take such action as it deems to be in the best interest of the Fund, including potentially liquidating the Fund.

Comparison of Original Sub-Advisory Agreement, Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement and New Sub-Advisory AgreementRelated Fees

The terms of each New Sub-Advisory Agreement, includingtables set forth in Appendix E provide the aggregate fees payable to the Sub-Adviser by Nuveen Fund Advisors thereunder, are substantially identical to those of the OriginalSub-Advisory Agreement, except for the date of effectiveness, and to those of the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement, except for the term and escrow provisions discussed below. There is no change in the fee rate payable by Nuveen Fund Advisors to the Sub-Adviser. If approved by shareholders of a Fund, the New Sub-Advisory Agreement for the Fund will expire on August 1, 2015, unless continued. Each New Sub-Advisory Agreement will continue in effect from year to year thereafter if such continuance is approved for the Fund at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. Below is a comparison of certain terms of the Original Sub-Advisory Agreements and the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements to the terms of the New Sub-Advisory Agreements.

Advisory Services. The advisory services to be provided by the Sub-Adviser to each Fund under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements will be identical to those advisory services previously provided by the Sub-Adviser to each Fund under the Original Sub-Advisory Agreements and currently provided under the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements. The Original Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements and the New Sub-Advisory Agreements provide that theSub-Adviser will furnish an investment program in respect of, make investment decisions for and place all orders for the purchase and sale of securities for the portion of the Fund’s investment portfolio allocated by the Adviser to the Sub-Adviser, all on behalf of the Fund and subject to oversight of the Fund’s Board and the Adviser. In performing its duties under the Original Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements and the New Sub-Advisory Agreements, theSub-Adviser will monitor the Fund’s investments and will comply with the provisions of the Fund’s organizational documents and the stated investment objectives, policies and restrictions of the Fund. It is not anticipated that the Transaction will have any adverse effect on the performance of the Sub-Adviser’s obligations under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements.

11

Brokerage. The Original Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements and the New Sub-Advisory Agreements authorize the Sub-Adviser to select the brokers or dealers that will execute the purchases and sales of portfolio securities for the Funds, subject to its obligation to obtain best execution under the circumstances, which may take account of the overall quality of brokerage and research services provided to the Sub-Adviser.

Fees. Under each Original Sub-Advisory Agreement, Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Adviser pays the Sub-Adviser a portfolio management fee out of the investment management fee it receives from the Fund. The rate of the portfolio management fees payable by the Adviser to the Sub-Adviser under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements is identical to the rate of the fees paid under the Original Sub-Advisory Agreements and the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements. The annual rate of portfolio management fees payable to the Sub-Adviser under the Original Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements and the New Sub-Advisory Agreements and the fees paid by the Adviser to the Sub-Adviser with respect to each Fundbilled during each Fund’s last two fiscal year are set forth inAppendix E.

Compensation earnedyears by the Sub-Adviser under an Interim Investment Management Agreement will be held in an interest-bearing escrow account. If shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement prior to February 28, 2015, the amount held in the escrow account will be paideach Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for engagements directly related to the Sub-Adviser. If shareholders of a Fund do not approve the New Investment Management Agreementoperations and New Sub-Advisory Agreement prior to February 28, 2015, the Sub-Adviser will be paid the lesser of its costs incurred in performing its services under the interim agreements or the total amount in the escrow account, plus interest earned.

Payment of Expenses. Under each Original Sub-Advisory Agreement, Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Sub-Adviser agrees to pay all expenses it incurs in connection with its activities under the agreement other than the cost of securities (including brokerage commissions) purchased for the Fund.

Limitation on Liability. The Original Sub-Advisory Agreements, Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements and New Sub-Advisory Agreements provide that the Sub-Adviser will not be liable for, and the Adviser will not take any action against the Sub-Adviser to hold the Sub-Adviser liable for, any error of judgment or mistake of law or for any loss suffered by the Fund in connection with the performance of the Sub-Adviser’s duties under the agreement, except for a loss resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence on the part of the Sub-Adviser in the performance of duties under the agreement, or by reason of its reckless disregard of its obligations and duties under the agreement.

Continuance. The Original Sub-Advisory Agreementfinancial reporting of each Fund originally was in effect for an initial term and could be continued thereafter for successive one-year periods if such continuance was specifically approved at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act. If the shareholders of a Fund approve the New Sub-Advisory Agreement for that Fund, the New Sub-Advisory Agreement will expire on August 1, 2015, unless continued. Thereafter, the New Sub-Advisory Agreement may be continued for successive one-year periods if approved at least annually in the manner required by the 1940 Act. Each Interim Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement will continue in effect for a term ending on the earlier of February 28, 2015 (150 days following the closing of the Transaction) or when shareholders of a Fund approve the New Investment Management Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement.

12

Termination. The Original Sub-Advisory Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement forincluding those relating (i) to each Fund provide that the agreement may be terminated at any time without the payment of any penalty by either party on sixty (60) days’ written notice. The Original Sub-Advisory Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement may also be terminated with respect to a Fund by action of the Board or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of that Fund, accompanied by sixty (60) days’ written notice. Each Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement may be terminated with respect to a Fund by action of the Fund’s Board or by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of that Fund, accompanied by ten (10) days’ written notice to the Sub-Adviser.

The Original Sub-Advisory Agreement, Interim Sub-Advisory Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreement for each Fund are also terminable with respect to that Fund at any time without the payment of any penalty, by the Adviser, the Board or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of that Fund in the event that it is established by a court of competent jurisdiction that the Sub-Adviser or any of its officers or directors has taken any action that results in a breach of the covenants of the Sub-Adviser set forth in such agreement.

Information About the Sub-Adviser

NAM is an affiliate of Nuveen Fund Advisors and serves as investment sub-adviser to each Fund. NAM is organized as a Delaware limited liability company, and its sole managing member is Nuveen Fund Advisors. The business address of NAM is 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

Certain information regarding the executive officer and directors of the Sub-Adviser is set forth inAppendix F.

Affiliated Brokerage and Other Fees

No Fund paid brokerage commissions within the last fiscal year to (i) any broker that is an affiliated person of such Fund or an affiliated person of such person, or (ii) any broker an affiliated person of which is an affiliated person of such Fund, the Adviser or the Sub-Adviser.

During each Fund’s last fiscal year, no Fund made any material payments to the Adviser or the Sub-Adviser or any affiliated person of the Adviser or the Sub-Adviser for services provided to the Fund (otherand (ii) to the Adviser and certain entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provide ongoing services to each Fund (“Adviser Entities”).

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Generally, the Audit Committee must approve each Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm’s engagements (i) with the Fund for audit or non-audit services and (ii) with the Adviser and Adviser Entities for non-audit services if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. Regarding tax and research projects conducted by the independent registered public accounting firm for each Fund and the Adviser and Adviser Entities (with respect to the operations and financial reporting of each Fund), such engagements will be (i) pre-approved by the Audit Committee if they are expected to be for amounts greater than $10,000; (ii) reported to the Audit Committee chair for his verbal approval prior to engagement if they are expected to be for amounts under $10,000 but greater than $5,000; and (iii) reported to the Audit Committee at the next Audit Committee meeting if they are expected to be for an amount under $5,000.

The Audit Committee has approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that the independent registered public accounting firm provided to each Fund and to the Adviser and Adviser Entities (with respect to the operations and financial reporting of each Fund). None of the services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm to each Fund or the Adviser or Adviser Entities were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the Original Investment Management Agreementpre-approval exception under Rule 2.01(c)(7)(i)(C) or Original Sub-Advisory Agreement or fees paid to the Distributor as described herein).Rule 2.01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X.

Shareholder Approval

To become effective with respectFor the Corporation, the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares present and entitled to vote at the Meeting will be required to elect the Board Members of the Corporation. This means that the nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes cast at the Meeting will be elected to serve as Board Members. For purposes of determining the approval of the proposal to elect nominees for the Corporation, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of Board Members.

The Board unanimously recommends that shareholders of each Fund vote FOR the election of each nominee of the Board.

27

PROPOSAL 2: REVISION TO FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT POLICY

(Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund only)

The 1940 Act requires that funds adopt certain investment policies that can only be changed by a vote of shareholders. These policies are considered “fundamental.” A fund must adopt fundamental policies related to the classifications and sub-classifications under the 1940 Act under which the fund may operate; borrowing money; the issuance of senior securities; engaging in the business of underwriting securities issued by other persons; concentrating investments in a particular industry or group of industries; the purchase and sale of real estate and commodities; and making loans to other persons. These policies are commonly referred to as “fundamental investment restrictions.” A fund may also elect to designate other policies as fundamental.

Proposed Revision to Fundamental Policy Related to Industry Concentration

Current Fundamental Investment Policy

Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund (the “Fund”) currently has the New Sub-Advisory Agreementfollowing fundamental investment policy, which can only be changed by a vote of the Fund’s shareholders:

The Fund will not concentrate its investments in a particular industry.

Proposed Fundamental Investment Policy

The Board has proposed the following fundamental investment policy:

Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of the sum of its net assets and the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes in equity securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. infrastructure-related companies. Infrastructure-related companies are composed of issuers in a variety of infrastructure-related industries, including electric utilities, transportation infrastructure and wireless telecommunication services. Pursuant to the Fund’s fundamental industry concentration policy, the Fund currently may not invest more than 25% of the value of its assets in any single such industry. From time to time, certain infrastructure industries may represent more than 25% of the infrastructure sector, as represented by the Fund’s benchmark, the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. As a result the Fund’s industry concentration policy may require underweighting the largest industries within the sector, as represented by the benchmark and limit the investment team’s ability to express industry-specific conviction.

Therefore, the Fund proposes to adopt a fundamental industry concentration policy, consistent with that of many peer infrastructure funds and other funds in the Fund Complex with a sector focus, to concentrate (i.e., invest more than 25% of the value of its assets) in securities of issuers in the group of industries that constitute the infrastructure sector.

The definition of “infrastructure industries” includes the following industries (as measured by reference to the Global Industry Classification Standard, or GICS): Air Freight and Logistics; Airlines; Electric Utilities; Energy Equipment and Services; Gas Utilities; Independent Power

28

and Renewable Electricity Producers; Marine; Multi-Utilities; Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels; Road and Rail; Transportation Infrastructure; and Water Utilities.

The rationale for changing from non-concentrated to concentrated is to facilitate the implementation of the Fund’s investment strategy within the infrastructure sector and enable the Fund’s portfolio management team to better express their convictions within the sector. The Board believes that the proposed amendment to the fundamental policy regarding industry concentration will provide the Fund with greater investment flexibility and improve the investment team’s ability to efficiently execute the investment strategy for Fund shareholders.

The Board recommends that you vote FOR this proposal.

Shareholder Approval

The above proposed revision to the Fund’s fundamental investment policy must be approved by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund, with all classes of shares voting together as a single class. The “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” is defined in the 1940 Act as the lesser of the vote of (i) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund entitled to vote thereon present at the meeting if the holders of more than 50% of such outstanding shares are present in person or represented by proxy; or (ii) more than 50% of such outstanding shares of the Fund entitled to vote thereon. For purposes of determining the approval of the New Sub-Advisory Agreements,above proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as shares voted against the proposal.

13

Each New Sub-Advisory Agreement was approved by the Board after consideration of all factors which it determined to be relevant to its deliberations, including those discussed below. The Board of each Fund also determined to submit the Fund’s New Sub-Advisory Agreement for consideration by the shareholders of the Fund.

The Board of each Fund unanimously recommends that shareholders of the Fund vote FOR approval of the Fund’s New Sub-Advisory Agreement.

14

BOARD CONSIDERATIONS

The Board of each Fund, including the Independent Board Members, is responsible for overseeing the performance of the Adviser andSub-Adviser to the respective Fund and determining whether to approve or continue such Fund’s investment management agreement andsub-advisory agreement. Pursuant to the 1940 Act, each Board is required to consider the continuation of the investment management agreement and sub-advisory agreement on an annual basis. Prior to its most recent annual review of the Original Investment Management Agreement and Original Sub-Advisory Agreement (collectively, the “Original Advisory Agreements”), the Board Members were advised of the potential acquisition of Nuveen byTIAA-CREF. For purposes of this section, references to “Nuveen” herein include all affiliates of Nuveen providing advisory,sub-advisory, distribution or other services to the Funds and references to the “Board” refer to the Board of each Fund. In accordance with the 1940 Act and the terms of the Original Advisory Agreements, the completion of the Transaction would terminate each of the Original Investment Management Agreements and OriginalSub-Advisory Agreements. Accordingly, at anin-person meeting held on April 30, 2014 (the “April Meeting”), the Board, including all of the Independent Board Members, performed its annual review of the Original Advisory Agreements and approved the continuation of the Original Advisory Agreements for the Funds. Furthermore, in anticipation of the termination of the Original Advisory Agreements that would occur upon the consummation of the Transaction, the Board also approved the New Investment Management Agreements and the NewSub-Advisory Agreements (collectively, the “New Advisory Agreements”) on behalf of the Funds to be effective following the completion of the Transaction and the receipt of the requisite shareholder approval.

Leading up to the April Meeting, the Independent Board Members had several meetings and deliberations, with and without management from Nuveen present and with the advice of legal counsel, regarding the Original Advisory Agreements, the Transaction and its impact and the New Advisory Agreements. At its meeting held onFebruary 25-27, 2014 (the “February Meeting”), the Board Members met with a senior executive representative ofTIAA-CREF to discuss the proposed Transaction. At the February Meeting, the Independent Board Members also established an ad hoc committee comprised solely of the Independent Board Members to monitor and evaluate the Transaction and to keep the Independent Board Members updated with developments regarding the Transaction. On March 20, 2014, the ad hoc committee met telephonically to discuss with management of Nuveen, and separately with independent legal counsel, the terms of the proposed Transaction and its impact on, among other things: the governance structure of Nuveen; the strategic plans for Nuveen; the operations of the Funds; the quality or level of services provided to the Funds; key personnel that service the Funds and/or the Board and the compensation or incentive arrangements to retain such personnel; Nuveen’s capital structure; the regulatory requirements applicable to Nuveen or Fund operations; and the Funds’ fees and expenses, including the Funds’complex-wide fee arrangement. Following the meeting of the ad hoc committee, the Board met in person (two Independent Board Members participating telephonically) in executive session on March 26, 2014 to further discuss the proposed Transaction. At the executive session, the Board met privately with independent legal counsel to review its duties with respect to reviewing advisory agreements, particularly in the context of a change of control, and to evaluate further the Transaction and its impact on the Funds, the Adviser andSub-Adviser (collectively, the “Fund Advisers” and each a “Fund Adviser”) and the services provided. Representatives of Nuveen

15

also met with the Board to update the Board Members on developments regarding the Transaction, respond to questions and to discuss, among other things: the governance of the Fund Advisers following the Transaction; the background, culture (including with respect to regulatory and compliance matters) and resources ofTIAA-CREF; the general plans and intentions ofTIAA-CREF for Nuveen; the terms and conditions of the Transaction (including financing terms); any benefits or detriments the Transaction may impose on the Funds,TIAA-CREF or the Fund Advisers; the reaction from Fund Advisers’ employees knowledgeable of the Transaction; the incentive and retention plans for key personnel of Fund Advisers; the potential access to additional distribution platforms and economies of scale; and the impact of any additional regulatory schemes that may be applicable to the Funds given the banking and insurance businesses operated in theTIAA-CREF enterprise. As part of its review, the Board also held a separate meeting onApril 15-16, 2014 to review the Funds’ investment performance and consider an analysis provided by the Adviser of theSub-Adviser, the Transaction and its implications to the Funds. During their review of the materials and discussions, the Independent Board Members presented the Adviser with questions and the Adviser responded. Further, the Independent Board Members met in executive session with independent legal counsel on April 29, 2014 and April 30, 2014.

In connection with their review of the Original Advisory Agreements and the New Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members received extensive information regarding the Funds and Fund Advisers including, among other things: the nature, extent and quality of services provided by a Fund Adviser; the organization and operations of any Fund Adviser; the expertise and background of relevant personnel of the Fund Adviser; a review of the applicable Fund’s performance (including performance comparisons against the performance of peer groups and appropriate benchmarks); a comparison of Fund fees and expenses relative to peers; a description and assessment of shareholder service levels for the Funds; a summary of the performance of certain service providers; a review of fund initiatives and shareholder communications; and an analysis of the Adviser’s profitability with comparisons to peers in the managed fund business. In light of the proposed Transaction, the Independent Board Members, through their independent legal counsel, also requested in writing and received additional information regarding the proposed Transaction and its impact on the provision of services by the Fund Advisers.

The Independent Board Members received, well in advance of the April Meeting, materials which responded to the request for information regarding the Transaction and its impact on Nuveen and the Funds including, among other things: the structure and terms of the Transaction; the impact of the Transaction on Nuveen, its operations and the nature, quality and level of services provided to the Funds, including, in particular, any changes to those services that the Funds may experience following the Transaction; the strategic plan for Nuveen, including any financing arrangements following the Transaction and anycost-cutting efforts that may impact services; the organizational structure ofTIAA-CREF, including the governance structure of Nuveen following the Transaction; any anticipated effect on each Fund’s expense ratios (including changes to advisory andsub-advisory fees) and economies of scale that may be expected; any benefits or conflicts of interest thatTIAA-CREF, Nuveen or their affiliates can expect from the Transaction; any benefits or undue burdens or other negative implications that may be imposed on the Funds as a result of the Transaction; the impact on Nuveen or the Funds as a result of being subject to additional regulatory schemes thatTIAA-CREF must comply with in operating its various businesses; and the costs associated with obtaining necessary shareholder approvals and the bearer of such costs. The Independent Board Members

16

also received a memorandum describing the applicable laws, regulations and duties in approving advisory contracts, including in conjunction with a change of control, from their independent legal counsel.

The materials and information prepared in connection with the review of the Original Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements supplemented the information and analysis provided to the Board during the year. In this regard, throughout the year, the Board, acting directly or through its committees, regularly reviewed the performance and various services provided by the Adviser andSub-Adviser. The Board met at least quarterly as well as at other times as the need arose. At its quarterly meetings, the Board reviewed reports by the Adviser regarding, among other things, Fund performance, Fund expenses, premium and discount levels ofclosed-end funds, the performance of the investment teams and compliance, regulatory and risk management matters. In addition to regular reports, the Adviser provided special reports to the Board or a committee thereof from time to time to enhance the Board’s understanding of various topics that impact some or all the Nuveen funds (such as distribution channels, oversight of omnibus accounts and leverage management topics), to update the Board on regulatory developments impacting the investment company industry or to update the Board on the business plans or other matters impacting the Adviser. The Board also met with key investment personnel managing certain Nuveen fund portfolios during the year.

In addition, the Board has created several standing committees (the Executive Committee; the Dividend Committee; the Audit Committee; the Compliance, Risk Management and Regulatory Oversight Committee; the Nominating and Governance Committee; theOpen-End Funds Committee; and theClosed-End Funds Committee). TheOpen-End Funds Committee andClosed-End Funds Committee are intended to assist the full Board in monitoring and gaining a deeper insight into the distinctive business practices ofclosed-end andopen-end funds. These two Committees have met prior to each quarterly Board meeting, and the Adviser provided presentations to these Committees permitting them to delve further into specific matters or initiatives impacting the respective product line.

Further, the Board continued its program of seeking to have the Board Members or a subset thereof visit eachsub-adviser to the Nuveen funds and meet key investment and business personnel at least once over a multiple year rotation. In this regard, the Independent Board Members made site visits to certain NAM equity and fixed income teams in September 2013 and met with the NAM municipal team at the August and November 2013 quarterly meetings.

The Board considered the information provided and knowledge gained at these meetings and visits during the year when performing its annual review of the Original Advisory Agreements and its review of the New Advisory Agreements. The Independent Board Members also were assisted throughout the process by independent legal counsel. During the course of the year and during their deliberations regarding the review of advisory contracts, the Independent Board Members met with independent legal counsel in executive sessions without management present. In addition, it is important to recognize that the management arrangements for the Funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Board Members and Fund management and that the Board Members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of fee arrangements and other factors developed in previous years.

The Board considered all factors it believed relevant with respect to each Fund, including, among other things: (a) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Fund

17

Advisers, (b) the investment performance of the Funds and Fund Advisers, (c) the advisory fees and costs of the services to be provided to the Funds and the profitability of the Fund Advisers, (d) the extent of any economies of scale, (e) any benefits derived by the Fund Advisers from the relationship with the Funds and (f) other factors. With respect to the New Advisory Agreements, the Board also considered the Transaction and its impact on the foregoing factors. Each Board Member may have accorded different weight to the various factors in reaching his or her conclusions with respect to a Fund’s Original Advisory Agreements and New Advisory Agreements. The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor as all-important or controlling. The Independent Board Members’ considerations were instead based on a comprehensive consideration of all the information presented. The principal factors considered by the Board and its conclusions are described below.

1. The Original Advisory Agreements

In considering renewal of the Original Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members considered the nature, extent and quality of the respective Fund Adviser’s services, including portfolio management services (and the resulting Fund performance) and administrative services. The Independent Board Members further considered the overall reputation and capabilities of the Adviser and its affiliates, the commitment of the Adviser to provide high quality service to the Funds, their overall confidence in the capability and integrity of the Adviser and its staff and the Adviser’s responsiveness to questions and concerns raised by them. The Independent Board Members reviewed materials outlining, among other things: the Fund Adviser’s organization and business; the types of services that the Fund Adviser or its affiliates provide to the Funds; the performance record of the applicable Fund (as described in further detail below); and any initiatives Nuveen had taken for the applicableopen-end orclosed-end fund product line.

In considering the services provided by the Fund Advisers, the Board recognized that the Adviser provides a myriad of investment management, administrative, compliance, oversight and other services for the Funds, and theSub-Adviser generally provides the portfolio advisory services to the Funds under the oversight of the Adviser. The Board considered the wide range of services provided by the Adviser to the Nuveen funds beginning with developing the fund, monitoring and analyzing its performance, to providing or overseeing the services necessary to support a fund’s daily operations. The Board recognized the Adviser, among other things, provides: (a) product management (such as analyzing ways to better position a fund in the marketplace, maintaining relationships to gain access to distribution platforms, and setting dividends); (b) fund administration (such as preparing a fund’s tax returns, regulatory filings and shareholder communications; managing fund budgets and expenses; overseeing the fund’s various service providers and supporting and analyzing new and existing funds); (c) Board administration (such as supporting the Board and its committees, in relevant part, by organizing and administering the Board and committee meetings and preparing the necessary reports to assist the Board in its duties); (d) compliance (such as monitoring adherence to the fund’s investment policies and procedures and applicable law; reviewing the compliance program periodically and developing new policies or updating existing compliance policies and procedures as considered necessary or appropriate; responding to regulatory requests; and overseeing compliance testing ofsub-advisers); (e) legal support (such as preparing or

18

reviewing fund registration statements, proxy statements and other necessary materials; interpreting regulatory requirements and compliance thereof; and maintaining applicable registrations); and (f) investment services (such as overseeing and reviewingsub-advisers and their investment teams; analyzing performance of the funds; overseeing investment and risk management; overseeing the daily valuation process for portfolio securities and developing and recommending valuation policies and methodologies and changes thereto; and participating in fund development, leverage management, and the development of investment policies and parameters).

In its review, the Board also considered the new services, initiatives or other changes adopted since the last advisory contract review that were designed to enhance the services and support the Adviser provides to the Nuveen funds. The Board recognized that some initiatives are amulti-year process. In reviewing the activities of 2013, the Board recognized that the year reflected the Adviser’s continued focus on fund rationalization for bothclosed-end andopen-end funds, consolidating certain funds through mergers that were designed to improve efficiencies and economies of scale for shareholders, repositioning various funds through updates in their investment policies and guidelines with the expectation of bringing greater value to shareholders, and liquidating certain funds. As in the past, the Board recognized the Adviser’s significant investment in its technology initiatives, including the continued progress toward a central repository for fund and other Nuveen product data and implementing a data system to support the risk oversight group enabling it to provide more detailed risk analysis for the Funds. The Board noted the new data system has permitted morein-depth analysis of the investment risks of the funds and across the complex providing additional feedback and insights to the investment teams and more comprehensive risk reporting to the Board. The Adviser also conducted several workshops for the Board regarding the new data system, including explaining the risk measures being applied and their purpose. The Board also recognized the enhancements in the valuation group within the Adviser, including centralizing the fund pricing process within the valuation group, trending to more automated and expedient reviews and continuing to expand its valuation team. The Board further considered the expansion of personnel in the compliance department enhancing the collective expertise of the group, investments in additional compliance systems and the updates of various compliance policies.

In addition to the foregoing actions, the Board also considered other initiatives related to theopen-end funds including, among other things: the continued focus on enhancing the product line through the development of new funds, including the development of alternative strategies reflecting trends in the industry; the enhanced support provided to the Board by providing comprehensivein-depth presentations to theOpen-End Funds Committee; and the development of a new class of shares for certain funds.

As noted, the Adviser also oversees theSub-Adviser who provides the portfolio advisory services to the Funds. In reviewing the portfolio advisory services provided to each Fund, the Nuveen Investment Services Oversight Team of the Adviser analyzes the performance of theSub-Adviser and may recommend changes to the investment team or investment strategies as appropriate. In assisting the Board’s review of theSub-Adviser, the Adviser provides a report analyzing, among other things, theSub-Adviser’s investment team and changes thereto, organization and history, assets under management, the investment team’s philosophy and strategies in managing the Fund, developments affecting theSub-Adviser or Fund and their performance. In their review of theSub-Adviser, the Independent Board Members considered,

19

among other things, the experience and qualifications of the relevant investment personnel, their investment philosophy and strategies, theSub-Adviser’s organization and stability, its capabilities and any initiatives taken or planned to enhance its current capabilities or support potential growth of business and, as outlined in further detail below, the performance of the respective Fund. The Independent Board Members also reviewed portfolio manager compensation arrangements to evaluate each Fund Adviser’s ability to attract and retain high quality investment personnel, preserve stability, and reward performance while not providing an inappropriate incentive to take undue risks.

Given the importance of compliance, the Independent Board Members also considered Nuveen’s compliance program, including the report of the chief compliance officer regarding the Nuveen funds’ compliance policies and procedures; the resources dedicated to compliance; the record of compliance with the policies and procedures; and its supervision of the Funds’ service providers. The Board recognized Nuveen’s commitment to compliance and strong commitment to a culture of compliance. Given the Adviser’s emphasis on monitoring investment risk, the Board has also appointed two Independent Board Members as point persons to review and keep the Board apprised of developments in this area and work with applicable Fund Adviser personnel.

Based on their review, the Independent Board Members found that, overall, the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the respective Funds under each applicable Original Advisory Agreement were satisfactory.

2. The New Advisory Agreements

In evaluating the nature, quality and extent of the services expected to be provided by the Fund Advisers under the applicable New Investment Management Agreement or NewSub-Advisory Agreement, the Board Members concluded that no diminution in the nature, quality and extent of services provided to the Funds and their shareholders by the respective Fund Advisers is expected as a result of the Transaction. In making their determination, the Independent Board Members considered, among other things: the expected impact, if any, of the Transaction on the operations, facilities, organization and personnel of the respective Fund Adviser; the ability of the Fund Adviser to perform its duties after the Transaction, including any changes to the level or quality of services provided to the Funds; the potential implications of any additional regulatory requirements imposed on the Fund Adviser or Funds following the Transaction; and any anticipated changes to the investment and other practices of the Funds.

The Board noted that the terms of each New Investment Management Agreement, including the fees payable thereunder, are substantially identical to those of the Original Investment Management Agreement relating to the same Fund. Similarly, the terms of each NewSub-Advisory Agreement, including fees payable thereunder, are substantially identical to those of the OriginalSub-Advisory Agreement relating to the same Fund. The Board considered that the services to be provided and the standard of care under the New Investment Management Agreements and the NewSub-Advisory Agreements are the same as the corresponding original agreements. The Board Members noted the Transaction also does not alter the allocation of responsibilities between the Adviser andSub-Adviser. TheSub-Adviser will continue to furnish an investment program, make investment decisions and place all orders for the purchase and sale of securities, all on behalf of the applicable Fund and subject to oversight of the Board and the Adviser. The Board noted thatTIAA-CREF did not anticipate any

20

material changes to the advisory, sub-advisory or other services provided to the Funds as a result of the Transaction. The Independent Board Members recognized that there were not any planned “cost cutting” measures that could be expected to reduce the nature, extent or quality of services. The Independent Board Members further noted that there were currently no plans for material changes to senior personnel at Nuveen or key personnel who provide services to the Funds and the Board following the Transaction. The key personnel who have responsibility for the Funds in each area, including portfolio management, investment oversight, fund management, fund operations, product management, legal/compliance and board support functions, are expected to be the same following the Transaction, although such personnel may have additional reporting requirements toTIAA-CREF. The Board also considered the anticipated incentive plans designed to retain such key personnel. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Board Members recognized that personnel changes may occur in the future as a result of normal business developments or personal career decisions.

The Board Members also considered Nuveen’s proposed governance structure following the Transaction and noted that Nuveen was expected to remain astand-alone business within theTIAA-CREF enterprise and operate relatively autonomously from the otherTIAA-CREF businesses, but would receive the general support and oversight from certainTIAA-CREF functional groups (such as legal, finance, internal audit, compliance, and risk management groups). The Board recognized, however, that Nuveen may be subject to additional reporting requirements as it keepsTIAA-CREF abreast of developments affecting the Nuveen business, may be required to modify certain of its reports, policies and procedures as necessary to conform to the practices followed in theTIAA-CREF enterprise, and may need to collaborate withTIAA-CREF with respect to strategic planning for its business.

In considering the implications of the Transaction, the Board Members also recognized the reputation and size ofTIAA-CREF and the benefits that the Transaction may bring to the Funds and Nuveen. In this regard, the Board recognized, among other things, that the increased resources and support that may be available to Nuveen fromTIAA-CREF and the improved capital structure of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the parent of the Adviser) that would result from the significant reduction in its debt level may reinforce and enhance Nuveen’s ability to provide quality services to the Funds and to invest further into its infrastructure.

Further, with the consummation of the Transaction, the Board recognized the enhanced distribution capabilities for the Funds as the Funds may gain access toTIAA-CREF’s distribution network, particularly throughTIAA-CREF’s retirement platform and institutional client base. The Board also considered that investors inTIAA-CREF’s retirement platform may choose to roll their investments as they exit their retirement plans into the Funds. The Independent Board Members recognized the potential cost savings to the benefit of all shareholders of the Funds from reduced expenses as assets in the Nuveen fund complex rise pursuant to thecomplex-wide fee arrangement described in further detail below.

Based on their review, the Independent Board Members found that the expected nature, extent and quality of services to be provided to the respective Funds under each applicable New Advisory Agreement were satisfactory and supported approval of the New Advisory Agreements.

21

1. The Original Advisory Agreements

The Board, including the Independent Board Members, considered the performance history of each Fund over various time periods. The Board reviewed reports, including an analysis of the Funds’ performance and the applicable investment team. In considering a Fund’s performance, the Board recognized that a Fund’s performance can be reviewed through various measures including the Fund’s absolute return, the Fund’s return compared to the performance of other peer funds, and the Fund’s performance compared to its respective benchmark. Accordingly, the Board reviewed, among other things, each Fund’s historic investment performance as well as information comparing the Fund’s performance information with that of other funds (the “Performance Peer Group”) and with recognized and/or customized benchmarks (i.e., generally benchmarks derived from multiple recognized benchmarks) for the quarter,one-,three- andfive-year periods ending December 31, 2013, as well as performance information reflecting the first quarter of 2014 (or for such shorter periods available for Funds that did not exist for part of the foregoing time frame). This information supplemented the Fund performance information provided to the Board at each of its quarterly meetings.

In evaluating performance, the Board recognized several factors that may impact the performance data as well as the consideration given to particular performance data.

22

With respect to any Nuveen funds for which the Board has identified performance concerns, the Board monitors such funds closely until performance improves, discusses with the Adviser the reasons for such results, considers those steps necessary or appropriate to address such issues, and reviews the results of any efforts undertaken. The Board is aware, however, that shareholders chose to invest or remain invested in a fund knowing that the Adviser manages the fund and knowing the fund’s fee structure.

In considering the performance data for the Funds, the Independent Board Members noted that the Funds had satisfactory performance compared to their peers. In this regard, each Fund performed in the second or third quartile over various periods.

Based on their review, the Independent Board Members determined that each Fund’s investment performance had been satisfactory.

2. The New Advisory Agreements

With respect to the performance of the Funds, the Board considered that the portfolio investment personnel responsible for the management of the Funds’ portfolios were expected to continue to manage the portfolios following the completion of the Transaction and the investment strategies of the Funds were not expected to change as a result of the Transaction. Accordingly, the findings regarding performance outlined above for the Original Advisory Agreements are applicable to the review of the New Advisory Agreements.

1. Fees and Expenses

The Board evaluated the management fees and expenses of each Fund reviewing, among other things, such Fund’s gross management fees, net management fees and net expense ratios in absolute terms as well as compared to the fees and expenses of a comparable universe

23

of funds provided by an independent fund data provider (the “Peer Universe”) and to a more focused subset of funds in the Peer Universe (the “Peer Group”) and any expense limitations.

The Independent Board Members further reviewed the methodology regarding the construction of the applicable Peer Universe and Peer Group. In reviewing the comparisons of fee and expense information, the Independent Board Members took into account that in certain instances various factors such as: the limited size and particular composition of the Peer Universe or Peer Group (including the inclusion of other Nuveen funds in the peer set); expense anomalies; changes in the funds comprising the Peer Universe or Peer Group from year to year; levels of reimbursement or fee waivers; the timing of information used; and differences in the states reflected in the Peer Universe or Peer Group (with respect to state municipal funds) may impact the comparative data thereby limiting somewhat the ability to make a meaningful comparison with peers.

In reviewing the fee schedule for a Fund, the Independent Board Members also considered thefund-level andcomplex-wide breakpoint schedules (described in further detail below) and any fee waivers and reimbursements provided by Nuveen. In reviewing fees and expenses, the Board considered the expenses and fees to be higher if they were over 10 basis points higher, slightly higher if they were approximately 6 to 10 basis points higher, in line if they were within approximately 5 basis points higher than the peer average and below if they were below the peer average of the Peer Group. In reviewing the reports, the Board noted that the majority of the Nuveen funds were at, close to or below their peer average based on the net total expense ratio. The Independent Board Members observed that the Mid Cap Index Fund had a net management fee and net expense ratio (including fee waivers and expense reimbursements) below its peer average, and while the Small Cap Index Fund had a net expense ratio that was slightly higher than its peer average, it had a net management fee that was below its peer average.

Based on their review of the fee and expense information provided, the Independent Board Members determined that each Fund’s management fees (as applicable) to a Fund Adviser were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund.

2. Comparisons with the Fees of Other Clients

The Board recognized that all Nuveen funds have asub-adviser, either affiliated ornon-affiliated, and therefore, the overall Fund management fee can be divided into two components, the fee retained by the Adviser and the fee paid to thesub-adviser. In general terms, the fee to the Adviser reflects the administrative and other services it provides to support the Funds (as described above) and while some administrative services may occur at thesub-adviser level, the fee to thesub-adviser generally reflects the portfolio management services provided by thesub-adviser. The Independent Board Members considered the fees a Fund Adviser assesses to the Funds compared to that of other clients. With respect tonon-municipal funds, such other clients of a Fund Adviser may include: separately managed accounts (both retail and institutional accounts), foreign investment funds offered by Nuveen, collective trust funds, and funds that are not offered by Nuveen but aresub-advised by one of Nuveen’s investment management teams.

The Independent Board Members reviewed the nature of services provided by the Adviser, including through its affiliatedsub-advisers and the average fee the affiliatedsub-advisers

24

assessed such clients as well as the range of fees assessed to the different types of separately managed accounts (such as retail, institutional or wrap accounts) to the extent applicable to the respectivesub-adviser. In their review, the Independent Board Members considered the differences in the product types, including, but not limited to: the services provided, the structure and operations, product distribution and costs thereof, portfolio investment policies, investor profiles, account sizes and regulatory requirements. In evaluating the comparisons of fees, the Independent Board Members noted that the fee rates charged to the Funds and other clients vary, among other things, because of the different services involved and the additional regulatory and compliance requirements associated with registered investment companies, such as the Funds. The Independent Board Members noted that as a general matter, higher fee levels reflect higher levels of service, increased investment management complexity, greater product management requirements and higher levels of risk or a combination of the foregoing. The Independent Board Members further noted, in particular, that the range of services provided to the Funds (as discussed above) is generally much more extensive than that provided to separately managed accounts. Many of the additional administrative services provided by the Adviser are not required for institutional clients. The Independent Board Members also recognized that the management fee rates of the foreign funds advised by the Adviser may vary due to, among other things, differences in the client base, governing bodies, operational complexities and services covered by the management fee. Given the inherent differences in the various products, particularly the extensive services provided to the Funds, the Independent Board Members believe such facts justify the different levels of fees.

3. Profitability of Fund Advisers

In conjunction with their review of fees, the Independent Board Members also considered the profitability of Nuveen for its advisory activities and its financial condition. The Independent Board Members reviewed the revenues and expenses of Nuveen’s advisory activities for the last two calendar years, the allocation methodology used in preparing the profitability data, an analysis of the key drivers behind the changes in revenues and expenses that impacted profitability in 2013 and Nuveen’s consolidated financial statements for 2013. The Independent Board Members noted this information supplemented the profitability information requested and received during the year to help keep them apprised of developments affecting profitability (such as changes in fee waivers and expense reimbursement commitments). In this regard, the Independent Board Members noted that two Independent Board Members served as point persons to review the profitability analysis and methodologies employed, any changes thereto, and to keep the Board apprised of such changes. The Independent Board Members also considered Nuveen’s revenues for advisory activities, expenses, and profit margin compared to that of various unaffiliated management firms.

In reviewing profitability, the Independent Board Members noted the Adviser’s continued investment in its business with expenditures to, among other things, upgrade its investment technology and compliance systems and provide for additional personnel and other resources. The Independent Board Members recognized the Adviser’s continued commitment to its business should enhance the Adviser’s capacity and capabilities in providing the services necessary to meet the needs of the Funds as they grow or change over time. In addition, in evaluating profitability, the Independent Board Members also noted the subjective nature of determining profitability which may be affected by numerous factors including the allocation

25

of expenses and that various allocation methodologies may each be reasonable but yield different results. Further, the Independent Board Members recognized the difficulties in making comparisons as the profitability of other advisers generally is not publicly available, and the profitability information that is available for certain advisers or management firms may not be representative of the industry and may be affected by, among other things, the adviser’s particular business mix, capital costs, size, types of funds managed and expense allocations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Independent Board Members noted the Adviser’s adjusted operating margin appears to be reasonable in relation to other investment advisers and sufficient to operate as a viable investment management firm meeting its obligations to the Funds. Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that the Adviser’s level of profitability for its advisory activities was reasonable in light of the services provided.

With respect to the Sub-Adviser, the Independent Board Members reviewed the Sub-Adviser’s revenues, expenses and profitability margins(pre- andpost-tax) for their advisory activities and the methodology used for allocating expenses among the internalsub-advisers. Based on their review, the Independent Board Members were satisfied that the respective Fund Adviser’s level of profitability was reasonable in light of the services provided.

In evaluating the reasonableness of the compensation, the Independent Board Members also considered other amounts paid to a Fund Adviser by the Funds as well as indirect benefits (such as soft dollar arrangements), if any, the Fund Adviser and its affiliates receive or are expected to receive that are directly attributable to the management of the Funds. See Section E below for additional information on indirect benefits the Fund Adviser may receive as a result of its relationship with the Funds. Based on their review of the overall fee arrangements of each Fund, the Independent Board Members determined that the advisory fees and expenses of the respective Fund were reasonable.

4. The New Advisory Agreements

As noted above, the terms of the New Advisory Agreements are substantially identical to their corresponding Original Advisory Agreements. The fee schedule, including the breakpoint schedule andcomplex-wide fee schedule, in each New Advisory Agreement is identical to that under the corresponding Original Advisory Agreement. The Board Members also noted that Nuveen has committed for a period of two years from the date of closing the Transaction (i) not to increase contractual management fee rates for any Fund and (ii) not to raise expense cap levels for any Fund from levels currently in effect or scheduled to go into effect prior to the Transaction. This commitment shall not limit or otherwise affect mergers or liquidations of any Funds in the ordinary course. Based on the information provided, the Board Members did not believe that the overall expenses would increase as a result of the Transaction. In addition, the Board Members recognized that the Nuveen funds may gain access to the retirement platform and institutional client base ofTIAA-CREF, and the investors in the retirement platforms may roll their investments into one or more Nuveen funds as they exit their retirement plans. The enhanced distribution access may result in additional sales of the Funds resulting in an increase in total assets under management in the complex and a corresponding decrease in overall management fees if additional breakpoints at thefund-level orcomplex-wide level are met. Based on its review, the Board determined that the management fees and expenses under the New Advisory Agreements were reasonable.

26

Further, other than from a potential reduction in the debt level of Nuveen Investments, the Board recognized that it is difficult to predict with any degree of certainty the impact of the Transaction on Nuveen’s profitability. Given the fee schedule was not expected to change under the New Advisory Agreements, however, the Independent Board Members concluded that the Fund Adviser’s level of profitability for its advisory activities under the New Advisory Agreements would continue to be reasonable in light of the services provided.

1. The Original Advisory Agreements

With respect to economies of scale, the Independent Board Members have recognized the potential benefits resulting from the costs of a fund being spread over a larger asset base, although economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision, particularly on afund-by-fund basis. One method to help ensure the shareholders share in these benefits is to include breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule. Generally, management fees for funds in the Nuveen complex are comprised of afund-level component and acomplex-level component, subject to certain exceptions. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members reviewed and considered the applicablefund-level breakpoints in the advisory fee schedules that reduce advisory fees as asset levels increase.

In addition tofund-level advisory fee breakpoints, the Board also considered the Funds’complex-wide fee arrangement. Pursuant to thecomplex-wide fee arrangement, the fees of the funds in the Nuveen complex are reduced as the assets in the fund complex reach certain levels, subject to certain exceptions. Thecomplex-wide fee arrangement seeks to provide the benefits of economies of scale to fund shareholders when total fund complex assets increase, even if assets of a particular fund are unchanged or have decreased. The approach reflects the notion that some of Nuveen’s costs are attributable to services provided to all its funds in the complex and therefore all funds benefit if these costs are spread over a larger asset base.

Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that the breakpoint schedules andcomplex-wide fee arrangement (as applicable) were acceptable and reflect economies of scale to be shared with shareholders when assets under management increase.

2. The New Advisory Agreements

As noted, the Independent Board Members recognized that thefund-level andcomplex-wide schedules will not change under the New Advisory Agreements. Assets in the funds advised byTIAA-CREF or its current affiliates will not be included in thecomplex-wide fee calculation. Nevertheless, the Nuveen funds may have access toTIAA-CREF’s retirement platform and institutional client base. The access to this distribution network may enhance the distribution of the Nuveen funds which, in turn, may lead to reductions in management andsub-advisory fees if the Nuveen funds reach additionalfund-level andcomplex-wide break point levels. Based on their review, including the considerations in the annual review of the Original Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members determined that thefund-level breakpoint schedules andcomplex-wide fee schedule continue to be appropriate and desirable in ensuring that shareholders participate in the benefits derived from economies of scale under the New Advisory Agreements.

27

1. The Original Advisory Agreements

In evaluating fees, the Independent Board Members received and considered information regarding potential “fall out” or ancillary benefits the respective Fund Adviser or its affiliates may receive as a result of its relationship with each Fund. In this regard, the Independent Board Members considered, among other things, any sales charges, distribution fees and shareholder services fees received and retained by the Funds’ principal underwriter, an affiliate of the Adviser, which includes fees received pursuant to any12b-1 plan. The Independent Board Members, therefore, considered the12b-1 fees retained by Nuveen during the last calendar year.

In addition to the above, the Independent Board Members considered whether the Fund Adviser received any benefits from soft dollar arrangements whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a Fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research that may be useful to the Fund Adviser in managing the assets of the Funds and other clients. The Funds’ portfolio transactions are allocated by theSub-Adviser. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members considered that theSub-Adviser may benefit from its soft dollar arrangements pursuant to which it receives research from brokers that execute the applicable Fund’s portfolio transactions. With respect to any fixed income securities, however, the Board recognized that such securities generally trade on a principal basis that does not generate soft dollar credits. Similarly, the Board recognized that the research received pursuant to soft dollar arrangements by theSub-Adviser may also benefit the applicable Funds and shareholders to the extent the research enhances the ability of theSub-Adviser to manage the respective Fund. The Independent Board Members noted that theSub-Adviser’s profitability may be somewhat lower if it did not receive the research services pursuant to the soft dollar arrangements and had to acquire such services directly.

Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that any indirect benefits received by a Fund Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Funds were reasonable and within acceptable parameters.

2. The New Advisory Agreements

The Independent Board Members noted that as the applicable policies and operations of the Fund Advisers with respect to the Funds were not anticipated to change significantly after the Transaction, such indirect benefits should remain after the Transaction. The Independent Board Members further noted the benefits the Transaction would provide toTIAA-CREF and Nuveen, including alarger-scale fund complex, certain shared services (noted above) and a broader range of investment capabilities, distribution capabilities and product line. Further, the Independent Board Members noted that Nuveen Investments, Inc. (the parent of the Adviser) would benefit from an improved capital structure through a reduction in its debt level.

In addition to the factors above, the Board Members also considered the following with respect to the Nuveen funds:

28

The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor discussed previously asall-important or controlling. The Board Members, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously concluded that the terms of each Original Advisory Agreement and New Advisory Agreement are fair and reasonable, that the respective Fund Adviser’s fees are reasonable in light of the services provided to each Fund and that the Original Advisory Agreements be renewed and the New Advisory Agreements be approved.

At the April Meeting, the Board Members, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously approved the Interim Investment Management Agreements and InterimSub-Advisory Agreements. If necessary to assure continuity of advisory services, the Interim Investment Management Agreements and InterimSub-Advisory Agreements would take effect upon the closing of the Transaction if shareholders had not yet approved the New Investment Management Agreements and NewSub-Advisory Agreements. The terms of each Interim Investment Management Agreement and InterimSub-Advisory Agreement are substantially identical to those of the corresponding Original Investment Management Agreement and New Investment Management Agreement and the OriginalSub-Advisory Agreement and NewSub-Advisory Agreement, respectively, except for certain term and fee escrow provisions. In light of the foregoing, the Board Members, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously determined that the scope and quality of services to be provided to the Funds under the respective Interim Investment Management Agreement and InterimSub-Advisory Agreement are at least equivalent to the scope and quality of services provided under the applicable Original Investment Management Agreement and OriginalSub-Advisory Agreement.

29

PROPOSAL 3: REVISIONS TO, OR ELIMINATION OF, CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL INVESTMENT POLICIES

The 1940 Act requires that each Fund adopt certain investment policies that can only be changed by a vote of shareholders. These policies are considered “fundamental.” Each Fund must adopt fundamental policies dealing with the classifications and sub-classifications under the 1940 Act under which the Fund may operate; borrowing money; the issuance of senior securities; engaging in the business of underwriting securities issued by other persons; concentrating investments in a particular industry or group of industries; the purchase and sale of real estate and commodities; and making loans to other persons. These policies are commonly referred to as “fundamental investment restrictions.” A Fund may also elect to designate other policies as fundamental. Each Fund has adopted fundamental investment restrictions with respect to the matters required by the 1940 Act. Certain Funds have also adopted additional fundamental investment restrictions.

Each Fund’s current fundamental investment policies generally reflect industry practices and market and regulatory conditions at the time of inception and adoption of such policies by each Fund. As a result, fundamental investment policies vary across the funds in the Nuveen fund complex. After reviewing the fundamental investment policies of the funds in the Nuveen fund complex, Fund management has developed a more uniform set of fundamental investment policies that reflect current best practices and the evolving market and regulatory environment. Fund management has recommended to the Board that certain fundamental investment policies be revised or eliminated and the Board has approved such revisions to, or elimination of, certain fundamental investment policies. Therefore, the Funds are seeking shareholder approval to revise or eliminate certain fundamental investment policies in order to implement this more uniform set of fundamental investment policies. Certain other funds in the Nuveen fund complex are concurrently seeking similar approvals.

The amendment and restatement or elimination of each applicable fundamental investment policy is set forth in a separate proposal below (Proposals 3(a) and 3(b)). No proposal to amend and restate or eliminate any fundamental investment policy is contingent upon the approval of any other such proposal.

Proposal 3(a) — Revision of Fundamental Investment Policy Related to the Purchase and Sale of Commodities

Current Fundamental Investment Policy

The Funds currently have the following fundamental investment policy, which can only be changed by a vote of the relevant Fund’s shareholders:

The Fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities or contracts relating to physical commodities.

30

Proposed Fundamental Investment Policy

The Board has proposed the following fundamental investment policy:

The Fund may not purchase or sell physical commodities, unless acquired as a result of ownership of securities or other instruments; but this restriction shall not prohibit the Fund from investing in options on commodity indices, commodity futures contracts and options thereon, commodity-related swap agreements, other commodity-related derivative instruments, and investment companies that provide exposure to commodities.

The 1940 Act requires each fund to have a fundamental investment policy governing the purchase and sale of commodities. Each Fund has a fundamental investment policy that generally prohibits the Fund from investing in physical commodities. However, these fundamental investment policies typically permit the Funds to make certain commodities related investments, such as investments in other investment companies that provide exposure to commodities or investments in certain instruments related to or backed by commodities. The proposed fundamental investment policy would establish a comprehensive description of the permitted commodity-related instruments in which a Fund may invest.

In addition, the proposed fundamental investment policy will conform the Funds’ policy relating to commodities to the standard policy of other funds in the Nuveen fund complex. Such standardization of fundamental investment policies is expected to (i) facilitate more effective management of the Funds’ portfolios by the Funds’ Adviser and Sub-Adviser, (ii) streamline the monitoring of compliance with applicable policies, (iii) eliminate conflicts across Funds among comparable policies resulting from minor variations in their terms and (iv) improve the ability of investors to evaluate and compare applicable investment policies across the Funds. In order to reflect changes over time in industry practices and regulatory requirements, the proposed amendments are intended to update fundamental investment policies that are more restrictive than required under the 1940 Act. Clarifying and modernizing these fundamental investment policies would allow the Funds to operate more efficiently within the limits of the 1940 Act and give the Funds greater flexibility to take advantage of, and react to, changes in financial markets and the development of new investment opportunities and instruments. Notwithstanding the flexibility provided by the proposed fundamental investment policy, each Fund would be subject to limitations established, from time to time, by the Board regarding the use and types of instruments permitted pursuant to the fundamental investment policy.

The revised policy is intended to further standardize the fundamental investment policies of funds in the Nuveen fund complex, eliminate unnecessary restrictions and provide the Funds greater flexibility to purchase investments and to adapt to market, industry, regulatory and technical changes. However, it is not currently anticipated that the proposed fundamental investment policy relating to commodities would result in any change to the Funds’ current investment strategies or entail any additional material risks to the Funds.

If approved by shareholders of athe Fund, the amended and restated fundamental investment policy will become effective as to that Fund when thatthe Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) is revised or supplemented to reflect the amendment. If athe proposed amendment is not approved by athe Fund’s shareholders, the current fundamental investment policy will remain in effect as to that Fund.effect.

31

The Board of each Fund unanimously recommends that shareholders of the Fund vote FOR this proposal.

Proposal 3(b) — Elimination of the Fundamental Policy Related to Investing for Control

Current Fundamental Investment Policy

The Funds currently have the following fundamental investment policy, which can only be changed by a vote of the relevant Fund’s shareholders:

The Fund will not invest in companies for the purpose of control or management.

The Board has proposed to eliminate the above fundamental investment policy.

The above fundamental investment policy was originally adopted by funds in the Nuveen fund complex to address then existing requirements of state “blue sky” securities authorities in connection with the registration of shares for sale in a particular state or states. However, since the enactment of the National Securities Market Improvement Act of 1996 (“NSMIA”), registered mutual funds, such as the Funds, are no longer required to qualify their shares with state authorities (although funds must still register their shares with states in which the shares are sold) and therefore such fundamental investment policies are no longer required. Funds in the Nuveen fund complex formed after the enactment of NSMIA generally have not adopted such fundamental investment policies. The 1940 Act does not require a fund to have a fundamental investment policy stating that it will not invest for the purpose of control or management.

Eliminating this fundamental policy will promote uniformity among the funds in the Nuveen fund complex. It is not the Funds’ intent to initially invest in any issuer for the purpose of exercising control. Each Fund that is classified as a diversified fund will continue to be subject to the diversification requirements of the 1940 Act, which limit the amount of an issuer’s voting securities that the Fund may acquire. However, eliminating the fundamental investment policy will conform the Funds’ policies to those of other funds in the Nuveen fund complex and avoid potential questions of interpretation as to what constitutes investment for control and therefore reduce administrative burdens and promote efficient portfolio management.

Elimination of this fundamental policy is not expected to have any material effect on the manner in which any Fund is managed, and the Board believes that the proposed elimination will provide the Funds with maximum flexibility to purchase and sell portfolio securities and other instruments in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies and consistent with current legal requirements.

If approved by shareholders of a Fund, the elimination of this fundamental investment policy will become effective as to that Fund when that Fund’s SAI is revised or supplemented to reflect the elimination. If the proposed elimination is not approved by a Fund’s shareholders, the current fundamental investment policy will remain in effect as to that Fund.

The Board of each Fund unanimously recommends that shareholders of the Fund vote FOR this proposal.

32

Shareholder Approval

Each of the above proposed revisions to or eliminations of fundamental investment policies must be approved by a vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the applicable Fund, with all classes of shares voting together as a single class. The “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” is defined in the 1940 Act as the lesser of the vote of (i) 67% or more of the shares of the Fund entitled to vote thereon present at the meeting if the holders of more than 50% of such outstanding shares are present in person or represented by proxy; or (ii) more than 50% of such outstanding shares of the Fund entitled to vote thereon. For purposes of determining the approval of each of the above proposals, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as shares voted against a proposal.

33

PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Independent Board Members have unanimously selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PWC”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the books and records of each Fund for each Fund’s current fiscal year. The selection of the independent registered public accounting firm of each Fund is being submitted to the shareholders for ratification, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of the Fund present and entitled to vote on the matter.

A representative of PwC will be present at the Meeting to make a statement, if such representative so desires, and to respond to shareholders’ questions. PwC has informed each applicable Fund that it has no direct or indirect material financial interest in the Funds, Nuveen, the Adviser or any other investment company sponsored by Nuveen.

Audit and Related Fees

The tables set forth inAppendix G provide the aggregate fees billed during each Fund’s last two fiscal years by each Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for engagements directly related to the operations and financial reporting of each Fund including those relating (i) to each Fund for services provided to the Fund and (ii) to the Adviser and certain entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Adviser that provide ongoing services to each Fund (“Adviser Entities”).

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Generally, the Audit Committee must approve each Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm’s engagements (i) with the Fund for audit or non-audit services and (ii) with the Adviser and Adviser Entities for non-audit services if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund. Regarding tax and research projects conducted by the independent registered public accounting firm for each Fund and the Adviser and Adviser Entities (with respect to the operations and financial reporting of each Fund), such engagements will be (i) pre-approved by the Audit Committee if they are expected to be for amounts greater than $10,000; (ii) reported to the Audit Committee chairman for his verbal approval prior to engagement if they are expected to be for amounts under $10,000 but greater than $5,000; and (iii) reported to the Audit Committee at the next Audit Committee meeting if they are expected to be for an amount under $5,000.

The Audit Committee has approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that the independent registered public accounting firm provided to each Fund and to the Adviser and Adviser Entities (with respect to the operations and financial reporting of each Fund). None of the services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm to each Fund or the Adviser or Adviser Entities were pre-approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the pre-approval exception under Rule 2.01(c)(7)(i)(C) or Rule 2.01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X.

The Board of each Fund unanimously recommends that shareholders of the Fund vote FOR ratification of the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm.

3429

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Attending the Meeting

If you wish to attendIn light of public health concerns regarding the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Meeting and vote in person, you will be held in a virtual meeting format only. Shareholders will not be able to do so. If you intend to attend the Meeting in personperson. Shareholders may participate in the Meeting at www.meetingcenter.io/251819459 by entering the control number found on the shareholder’s proxy card and password NUV2020 at the date and time of the Meeting. Shareholders may vote during the Meeting by following the instructions that will be available on the Meeting website during the Meeting.

If your shares are registered in your name, you are a record holder of a Fund’s shares, in orderdo not need to gain admission you must show photographic identification, such as your driver’s license. If you intendregister to attend the Meeting in person andvirtually on the Internet. If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other custodian, in order to gain admission you must show photographic identification,an intermediary, such as your driver’s license, and satisfactory proof of ownership of shares of a Fund, such as your voting instruction form (or a copy thereof) or broker’s statement indicating ownership as of a recent date. If you hold your shares in a brokerage account or through a bank or other nominee,broker, you will not be ablemust register in advance to vote in person atattend the Meeting unlessvirtually on the Internet.

To register to attend the Meeting online by webcast, you have previously requestedmust submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your Fund holdings along with your name and obtained a “legal proxy” from your broker,email address to shareholdermeetings@computershare.com. You must contact the bank or other nominee and present it at the Meeting. You may contact the Funds at (877) 821-2278broker who holds your shares to obtain directionsyour legal proxy. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, three business days prior to the siteMeeting date.

You will receive a confirmation of the Meeting.your registration by email after we receive your registration materials.

Requests for registration should be directed to us by emailing an image of your legal proxy to shareholdermeetings@computershare.com.

Principal Shareholders

AsThe persons who held of record more than 5% of any class of shares of each Fund, as of the Record Date, are set forth on Appendix F. To the knowledge of the Funds, as of the Record Date, no shareholder owned, beneficially or of record, more than 5% of any class of shares of any Fund, except as provided inAppendix HF.

Information About the Adviser and Distributor

The Adviser

Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (“Nuveen Fund Advisors”), the Funds’ investment adviser, offers advisory and investment management services to a broad range of clients, including investment companies and other pooled investment vehicles. Nuveen Fund Advisors has overall responsibility for management of the Funds, oversees the management of the Funds’ portfolios, manages the Funds’ business affairs and provides certain clerical, bookkeeping and other administrative services. Nuveen Fund Advisors is located at 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606. Nuveen Fund Advisors is a subsidiary of Nuveen, LLC, the investment management arm of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (“TIAA”). TIAA is a life insurance company founded in 1918 by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and is the companion organization of College Retirement Equities Fund. As of June 30, 2020, Nuveen, LLC managed approximately $1.05 trillion in assets, of which approximately $144.4 billion was managed by Nuveen Fund Advisors.

30

Nuveen Fund Advisors has selected its affiliate, Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“Nuveen Asset Management”), located at 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606, to serve as sub-adviser to each Fund. Nuveen Asset Management manages the investment of the Funds’ assets on a discretionary basis, subject to the supervision of Nuveen Fund Advisors.

The Distributor

Nuveen Securities, LLC, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606, serves as the distributor for the Funds’ shares.

Shareholder Proposals

The Corporation generally does not hold annual shareholders’ meetings, but will hold special meetings as required or deemed desirable. Because the Corporation does not hold regular shareholders’ meetings, the anticipated date of the next special shareholders’ meeting (if any) cannot be provided. Shareholders wishing to submit proposals for inclusion in a proxy statement for a subsequent shareholders’ meeting of shareholders of the Corporation should send their written proposal to the Corporation at 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606. Proposals must be received a reasonable time before the Corporation begins to print and mail its proxy materials for the meeting.

Shareholder Communications

Fund shareholders who want to communicate with the Board or any individual Board Member should write to the attention of Lorna Ferguson,William Siffermann, Manager of Fund Board Relations, Nuveen, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606. The letter should indicate that you are a Fund shareholder and note the Fund or Funds that you own. If the communication is intended for a specific Board Member and so indicates it will be sent only to that Board Member. If a communication does not indicate a specific Board Member, it will be sent to the Independent ChairmanChair and the outside counsel to the Independent Board Members for further distribution as deemed appropriate by such persons.

Expenses of Proxy Solicitation

The cost of preparing, printing and mailing the enclosed proxy, accompanying notice and proxy statement and all other costs in connection with the solicitation of proxies will be paid

35

by Nuveen and TIAA-CREF.the Funds (allocated among the Funds based on relative net assets). Solicitation may be made by letter or telephone by officers or employees of Nuveen or the Adviser, or by dealers and their representatives. The Funds have engaged Computershare Fund Services and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies at anproxies. No solicitation expenses are expected for any Fund in connection with Proposal 1. An estimated cost of $[        ] per Fund$7,500 plus reasonable expenses.expenses is expected for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund in connection with Proposal 2.

Fiscal Year

The fiscal year end of each Fund is October 31.set forth on Appendix A.

31

Shareholder Report Delivery

Shareholder reports will be sent to shareholders of record of each Fund following the applicable period. Each Fund will furnish, without charge, a copy of its annual report and/or semi-annual report as available upon request. Such written or oral requests should be directed to such Fund at 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606 or by calling 1-800-257-8787.

Please note that only one annual report, semi-annual report or proxy statement may be delivered to two or more shareholders of a Fund who share an address, unless the Fund has received instructions to the contrary. To request a separate copy of an annual report,semi-annual report or proxy statement, or for instructions as to how to request a separate copy of such documents or as to how to request a single copy if multiple copies of such documents are received, shareholders should contact the applicable Fund at the address and phone number set forth above.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting To Be Held on December 22, 2014November 16, 2020

Each Fund’s proxy statement is available at www.nuveenproxy.com/ProxyInfo/MF/Default.aspx.Mutual-Fund-Proxy-Information/. For more information, shareholders may also contact the applicable Fund at the address and phone number set forth above.

General

Management does not intend to present and does not have reason to believe that any other items of business will be presented at the Meetings.Meeting. However, if other matters are properly presented to the MeetingsMeeting for a vote, the proxies will be voted by the persons acting under the proxies upon such matters in accordance with their judgment of the best interests of the Fund.

A list of shareholders entitled to be present and to vote at eachthe Meeting will be available at the offices of the Funds, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, for inspection by any shareholder during regular business hours beginning ten days prior to the date of the Meeting.

Failure of a quorum to be present at anythe Meeting will necessitate adjournment and willmay subject thatyour Fund to additional expense. The persons named in the enclosed proxy may also move for an adjournment of anythe Meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies with respect to any proposal if they determine that adjournment and further solicitation is reasonable and in the

36

best interests of the Funds. Under each Fund’s By-Laws, an adjournment of a meeting with respect to a matter requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on the matter present in person (virtually) or represented by proxy at the Meeting. The persons named in the enclosed proxy card will vote in favor of any such adjournment if they believe the adjournment and additional proxy solicitation are reasonable and in the best interests of shareholders.

IF YOU CANNOT BE PRESENT AT THE MEETING (VIRTUALLY), YOU ARE REQUESTED TO FILL IN, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY PROMPTLY. NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.

Kevin J. McCarthyChristopher M. Rohrbacher

Vice President and Secretary

November [            ], 2014September 30, 2020

3732

AppendixAPPENDIX A

FUND INFORMATION